A Buffet of Really Big Boy Sex Tips

12Dec/0940

A Buffet of Really Big Boy Sex Tips

From GLSEN (? happfeet says Commonwealth of Massachusetts), via Serr8d

Speaking of scandal, I'm really sick of this shit.

UPDATE: I hope this represents progress.

Dan Collins

Dan Collins is a dude who blogs. He used to blog elsewhere. Now he blogs here.

More Posts - Website

Filed under: Too Lazy to Categorize Leave a comment

Comments (40) Trackbacks (2) ( subscribe to comments on this post )

Ann R Kissed
December 12th, 2009 - 07:19

The crowd supports the most conservative person in any debate. Period. Jeff fought his entire commentariat on some issue or another where he was supporting Obama on a principled ground, and â€œgot his ass handed to himâ€ because his commenters failed to see the principle and just unloaded on him for taking the lefty position. So you canâ€™t look to the crowd for how youâ€™re doing in these debates.

Oh wee, another chance to drop the racist dime on that Slingblade idiot, Stacy McCain.

Hey, Patterico, are you referring to the time Jeff stood tall and defended Letterman? That was a hoot, the day the PW swarm decided in unison that Letterman was never ever funny. I agreed with Ghoster Goldstein on Letterman, for the record. It was little more than a poorly worded joke.

How Ghoster G keeps on defending RSMâ€™s intent or how he pimps that Jonah Goldberg garbage I havenâ€™t the foggiest. If I was to go psychoanalytical, Iâ€™d say he gets lost in the kindred spirit of victimization brotherhood, but I dunno, who can really say outside of the classically trained Freudians.

Eff RSM, racist or not – and thereâ€™s only one honest conclusion, IMHO – heâ€™s still the bitterest of panty stains.

Hi Darleen! Spin, old girl, spin and sputter!

O!

——————————-

I posted this over at Attila the RSM Defender’s blog but she’s got some moderation block on so who knows if she can handle thor action. I doubt it. Sounds like Attila’s one for cheap politics before honesty.

BTW, is that the Kip’s Big Boy in the graphic or is that Bob? Arf.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
- Bob Reed
  December 12th, 2009 - 12:53
  
  Have I told you lately just how pathetic you are?
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )
  - Ann R Kissed
    December 13th, 2009 - 04:32
    
    You attempted to.
    
    ePiC FaiL!!!11!!
    
    Like or Dislike: 0 0
    ( REPLY )
listing starboard
December 12th, 2009 - 08:19

Did Shoney’s restaurants give them permission to use the Big Boy in this way? Words cannot express how profoundly repulsive this is.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
Dan Collins
December 12th, 2009 - 08:23

Big Boy’s not actually on the real thing, but a similar looking picture of a cartoon doctor.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 12:50

That book was actually produced by Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts, not GLSEN. I don’t know why Mitt Romney let this sort of thing be produced.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 13:11

It was written by the Boston-based AIDS Action Committee, with help with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the Boston Public Health Commission.*

That’s its specific provenance I guess. The person what went to the conference for the express purpose of finding icky inappropriate stuff didn’t notice it til she got home.

Sally Turner, 73, of Carlisle, an Article 8 Alliance supporter who attended the conference, said she picked up literature from each of the tables, and didn’t examine it until hours later. “I looked at it at home and I was a little bit astonished by what I had,” she said.*

Sally Turner, 73, of Carlisle, an Article 8 Alliance supporter who attended the conference, is not unlikely full of shit. Did she keep her mouf shut cause wanted to make sure this pamphlet was available for kids cause it would be politically useful? Not unlikely I don’t think.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
Dan Collins
December 12th, 2009 - 13:26

Margot Abels says different, though . . .

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 13:40

That’s a whole different dealio… Margot was the hoochie what did the Q&A session at Tuft’s University in 2000 where someone asked about fisting… Margot wasn’t a GLSEN employee… Margot is a disgruntled idiot I think. Do you really think she has a ton of credibility?

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
Dan Collins
December 12th, 2009 - 13:50

I think that if she’s the one who took the rap for something that was on the agenda, then she’s right to be disgruntled. Do you really think she was a “rogue employee”?

The charge is that GLSEN had a major role in shaping the agenda. NGO’s directing government resources without having to submit to democratic vetting is pretty much Obama’s idea of paradise.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 14:21

That was a q&a session – the fisting question wasn’t “on the agenda” … Margot wasn’t fired by GLSEN…

On May 19, state education chief David Driscoll canned Abels and Netherland and terminated Gaucherâ€™s contract. But Driscoll also insisted that the controversial workshop was an aberration that shouldnâ€™t be allowed to derail the entire program. Abels fumed to the press that the education department had known perfectly well what she had been doing for years and hadnâ€™t cared until the tapes had surfaced. Camenker, ironically, agreed.

Margot’s talking about the DOE… that hate site that Jim Hoft gets all his stuff from tries to tie Jennings to Abels like this…

Jennings, after all, worked hand in hand with the Mass. Department of Education from the beginning, as co-chair of the Governorâ€™s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth education committee, which set up the statewide program, â€œSafe Schools for Gay and Lesbian Studentsâ€ in the DOE. That is the program the fisting workshop instructors worked forâ€¦

But if you look at the program [PDF] … it says the hapless Margot is a coordinator of the HIV\AIDS Pogram of the Massachusetts DOE.

I think Margot worked for the DOE and that it’s Republican Paul Cellucci’s Education Deparetmnent that people should have a problem with.

Jim Hoft is an enthusiastic hatey liar I think. There’s absolutely zero proof that Kevin Jennings is responsible for Margot’s stupid fisting enthusiasms.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 14:27

oh. Here’s the link for pasty shut-in Jim Hoft’s go-to hate site. I don’t think anyone with any discernment can read that and conclude a link between Kevin Jennings and Margot Abels. This is a hate site pitched to the ear of gullible stupid haters. Haters like First Thing’s Jim Hoft and the ever-screechy Fox News whore Michelle Malkin.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 14:28

crap. wrong link.

here’s the link for pasty shut-in Jim Hoftâ€™s go-to hate site.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 14:32

oh. *Department* I mean.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
- Bob Reed
  December 12th, 2009 - 14:36
  
  happyfeet, did Patterico actually ban you? I saw Pablo taunting him about that and wondered.
  
  I haven’t visited there much since Karl started cross posting at Cap’n Ed’s; also Pat talks about a lot of L.A. stuff that is probably of more interest to you than folks here on Long Island…
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )
  - Pablo
    December 12th, 2009 - 19:45
    
    Yeah, he did. He didn’t quite get ‘feets unique brand of snark and dropped the hammer on him. It didn’t last long, as things were explained to him, but it happened.
    
    Like or Dislike: 0 0
    ( REPLY )
Bob Reed
December 12th, 2009 - 14:34

My only comment on the contents of this guide are that I hope that it is being given only to high school age students. While I disagree with the lifestyle choices that it provides instruction for, and believe that there are some “curious and impressionable” teens who may be led down a road they may have not traveled otherwise by it’s content, it is important to address the public health issues involved in this lifestyle’s acts…

And, I also believe that there are better things to be teaching our children in public schools, like, oh, let’s say, how to proficiently read, write, cipher, and myriad other non-sexually related topics…

I’m no prude, and I recognize, and remember, all of the “activities” of my teenage years, as well as what went on around me. But, I believe that there is also an element of wishing to “mainstream” homosexuality involved. Just as the schools should spent less time on “social justice” so to should they not be trying to mainstream alternative lifestyles.

But there is a fine line to walk here, with respect to public health issues, the pursuit of happiness, and progressive societal agendas…

There are bigger fish to fry, but this is an example of how far the public schools have strayed from actual educational prusuits. And, it’s an indocation of how liberal what passes for a Massachussettes Republican can be?

Hear that Mitt Romney?

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 14:49

that was a misunderstanding forever ago, Bob… I was quoted something psycho said if I remember right –

psycho can be startling for people who aren’t used to him I think…

I don’t think that book was even appropriate for high school kids but I think it was a mistake unrelated to anything Mr. Jennings is about. He’s a dirty socialist and is steeped in all sorts of whack job queer theory but its irresponsible for First Things and its psychotic commenters to call him a pedophile child pornographer pervert what wants to get children raped.

I think it would be a better world if dirty socialist organizations like GLSEN didn’t exist, but hate campaigns like First Things and Michelle Malkin’s is what gives these groups their justification I think.

This is crass opportunism on the part of people who are trying to hijack the Not Dirty Socialist agenda I think.

Isn’t it weird that hatey Michelle and hatey Jim have no criticisms to offer about how Kevin Jennings is comporting himself in his new job? But Energy Secretary Steven Chu is doing untold harm to our little country.

I think Steven Chu likes young boys. Could someone please pass that on to Michelle?

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
- Bob Reed
  December 12th, 2009 - 14:57
  
  Ha! If she were told that she’d be all in, I’m sure!
  
  I agree with you that in many ways it seems like there are some who are more concerned with the benefits their criticisms bring them personally than in actually combatting Obama and the Soros-sphere’s socialist agenda. And that’s just wrong.
  
  Sure, we all need to look out for ourselves, and I don’t begrudge people profiting from doing what they love-blogging about politics for instance.
  
  But it should be about the ramifications on our nation and way of life, and not about over-emphasizing the trivial, and manufacturing faux Outrage!.
  
  I mean, there’s enough real stuff happening to generate real outrage over; nothing need be made up nor misconstrued.
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )
  - happyfeet
    December 12th, 2009 - 14:59
    
    I think you said that better than I’ve been trying to.
    
    Like or Dislike: 0 0
    ( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 14:50

I was quoted… I was quoting I mean

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 14:58

also I all kinds of misspelled Massachusetts I think

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
- Pablo
  December 12th, 2009 - 19:46
  
  It deserves that and so much more, ‘feets.
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )
serr8d
December 12th, 2009 - 17:42

I’m still wondering if Kevin Jennings is getting the raw fist… ‘feets, I lurvs your commentary and you’ve my respect, and your support of Jennings is unsettling to me. Does this Jennings guy deserve your unequivocal support? He’s supposed to be the ‘Safe Schools’ czar, making schools safe…for every kid in the nation, ‘kids’. OK, I’ll bite; given that he’s not actually a pedophile, that he’s not a ‘fisting kit’ distributor; but he did form GLSEN, an organization with a stated purpose of community organizing gay kids.

Is he really up to the job of working with all kids? Can he relate to the majority, to straight kids? What’s his qualifications outside of GLSEN that make him worthy of his position? Is his appointment just a bone thrown to the Gay Community, those who’ve been disappointed with Teh O!ne’s seemingly standoffish treatment of their causes?

Better question, I suppose: are any Obama-appointed lefty-narrative-steeped ‘czars’ good for our country?

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
- happyfeet
  December 12th, 2009 - 20:48
  
  I can’t comment at your blog anymore… something’s changed where I don’t have the option I used to use…
  
  But I think I’m less supportive of Kevin Jennings, who seems fairly insignificant in the scheme of things, than I am unsupportive of the hatey Holt/Malkin campaign against him. It’s 100% on par with what has been leveled against Mrs. Palin, and I think it irresponsibly and maliciously furthers harmful stereotypes.
  
  I think this sort of campaign is part of the problem of our little country’s recently manifested and rapidly increasing suckyness.
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )
  - serr8d
    December 13th, 2009 - 07:23
    
    I checked off an option that requires at least an OpenID of some sort. Because it seems that all of the purely ‘anonymous’ people all hail from Sadly, No! or lower, and I’m not going to entertain a comment from that realm.
    
    OpenID’s requirements aren’t difficult to meet. Blogger is a free service that a lot of people sign up to to to have that OpenID. The blog is optional! A TypePad account is even better, as they have a list of sign-ins that includes g00gle, Facebook, Myspace and Twitter.
    
    The days of purely anonymous commenting are over. Thank people like SWWNBN and that barrelful of used douchebags, thor, &c.
    
    Like or Dislike: 0 0
    ( REPLY )
Dan Collins
December 12th, 2009 - 17:45

I think that happyfeet believes that people are attacking Jennings on the basis of trumped up charges and a web of innuendo. It’s important that the facts be factual.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
Pablo
December 12th, 2009 - 19:47

And it’s important to note that we need a “safe schools czar” like we need another hole in our heads. And that the position was Bush’s idea.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 19:57

Of course GLSEN is a dirty socialist community organizing group, serr8d… but if it was a problem it was a problem before Kevin Jennings got his bullshit Department of Education job I think.

This campaign has nothing to do with challenging GLSEN’s policies or approach… Kevin Jennings left the organization before the election… and there’s not a single person what’s been brought forward what Mr. Jennings can be said to have in anyway harmed. This is an ugly political attack on a good guy what is a little light in his dirty socialist loafers is all I think.

Kevin Jennings is an elections have consequences thing.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 20:06

But I think my point is more that if people want to go after Kevin Jennings, they should do it in a way that’s not overheated and cartoonish and inciteful. And what Jim Holt and Michelle Malkin are doing is hateful and wrong… there’s no reason whatsoever not to think that Kevin Jennings has acted in good faith with respect to running an organization he thought was helpful in making schools a better place for gay kids.

Fisting kits. Who are these people?

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
SBP
December 12th, 2009 - 20:21

I know I always like to get my medical info from a source that can’t even spell “hepatitis”.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
serr8d
December 12th, 2009 - 20:36

It seems every Obama appointee has had a double dose of raised eyebrows. That’s our jobs, to offset the easy treatment the MSM gives ‘em, to discover exactly what is hiding in their narrative-advancing hearts.

Let’s say Kevin Jennings is as pure as wind-driven snow (well, no, that’s implausible; maybe wind-driven snow that refuses to melt for 20 weeks and is becoming a bit dirty). He becomes a target of Michelle Malkin and whoever else. Is that only because MM &c. only picks on low-hanging fruits? Are these attacks simply wrong, because it’s Jennings, or because he’s gay, or are these attacks justified just because he’s an Obama appointee?

As I said before, Jennings has 2 strikes against him just for being there, as Obama’s choice. There’s plenty of other ‘czars’ out there with potential to cause damage. Maybe taking out another one might sully all of ‘em (the scattershot effect).

Why should Jennings get a pass?

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 20:54

ok that was clever with the fruits…

I think the attacks are wrong cause they’re very dishonest with respect to actually implicating Kevin Jennings in any wrongdoing…

I don’t think Jennings should get a pass at all. But I don’t think he should be the target of a hate campaign either. He’s not a bad guy I don’t think, and he certainly hasn’t been shown to be a bad guy. He just a run of the mill dirty socialist, and I think we can oppose these ones without brutalizing them and tagging them as pedophiles. That’s how they do it in fucking Indonesia for Christ’s sake.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
happyfeet
December 12th, 2009 - 20:55

*He’s* just a run of the mill dirty socialist I mean…

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )