The meme being floated by the self-appointed Intelligentsia with regard to Palin is that she is somehow not up to snuff on the issues of the day. That somehow she is ignorant of the issues that face us and lacks the knowledge to lead – offering criticisms rather than potential solutions. I find this a most obnoxious meme.
Alas, these critiques come from the very people Palin (and indeed all who find themselves moved by her speeches) has rightly targeted in her criticisms. And once again, instead of countering her complaints, they seek only to malign.
It is true that Palin has not demonstrated, on a national level, an ability to solve the major problems that face this country. Most obviously because she has not had an opportunity to do so. It is true that her resume does not include elbow-rubbing with the movers and shakers inside the Beltway. It is true she may not even comprehend how the “Game” is played in DC. We can only go on our gut instinct about her and her successes in Alaska… we can only take a sort of leap of faith when it comes to Palin. We can only, those of us who see in her something more than a charismatic pit-bull in chief, imagine what she might accomplish in the Oval Office.
To those that criticize that she lacks the necessary gravitas, I would only chuckle. For Obama, who now sits in the Oval Office, has not demonstrated the ability to solve the major problems that face this country, despite having a year of opportunities to do so. And this man IS the mover and shaker in the Beltway. The man whose elbows every political creature, especially in the early days of his presidency, have been trying to rub. Obama, who stands behind the presidential seal, who was voted into office with the hope that the “Game” Palin is now accused of not understanding would have its rules upended with an Obama victory, was beneficiary of a Giant Leap of Faith. And many who voted him into office realize that he is maybe not the One they anticipated… he is not the Game-Changer they had envisioned when they cast their ballots. Quite the contrary – he is now faced with the realities of DC. And his ability to navigate the political landscape is woeful at best. In some fashion he really seems not to understand the rules at all. And certainly does not comprehend the finer, more delicate politics involved. Never mind his complete detachment from the Will of the People.
It is true the Framers envisioned an apparatus given to the status quo. It is true they fashioned mechanism that had a high propensity to gridlock. And thankfully so. It is true that the vibrancy of our federal government is due to its preference for inaction. And again, thankfully so. So that no man or woman should ever master the mechanism is what all Constitutionalists pray for. That no so-called charismatic executive will ever seduce her entirely… this Lady Liberty… is what we should celebrate when we think of the Genius built into the apparatus.
So, really, at the end of the day, should we desire an executive that seeks to master that which is not to be mastered? Or should we tend toward those who are governed by true and abiding love of principle? Should we prefer an ideologue whose belief-system seeks to upend the apparatus? Or should we prefer one who is guided by principles which are, to the degree possible given Lady Liberty’s disagreeable nature, most harmonious with her very essence?
From this perspective, I cannot help to think that Palin, as studied or learned as she may or may not be, is a creature who sings a theme that resonates with the institutional instrument itself. At least to the degree that is possible. I do not think the concept of limited government, limited interference, limited confiscatory taxation, limited oversight of commerce, limited social programming, limited policing of ever decreasing freedoms, and limited governance is trite. Not in the least. Palin herself is governed by these very principles. These, the underlying beliefs she proclaims, are broad but profound. And they are very much in harmony with the machine the Framers constructed. A master craftsman of any medium spends all of his initial energies understanding his medium. And at first (while still a novice) begins by trying to master it. Eventually realizing the folly of artistic masturbation, he then comprehends that there are limitations in the material he at first sought to master. If he is sufficiently dedicated and bright enough, he conforms himself to the least degree possible to the innate limitations of the medium. Then, understanding what can be and what will not be at the macro level, asserts himself within the medium prudently. Artistic Genius is most often affiliated with those who intuitively comprehend that equilibrium is only to be had when the master sublimates the creaturely desire to master the medium, and instead gives himself to achieving harmony with it at the first – and then and only then allowing for his own personal style to express itself.
One must first have two hands to “master” the violin. Drum sticks just won’t do it. Ever. No matter who wields them. And no matter what they wear when they try.
Could we call her wise? Or at least, enlightened in a Mr. Magoo sort of way? I think so. And then what about the Golden Boy who approaches the battered violin each and every day with drumsticks? So confident is Obama that today – tomorrow – or the next – HE will eventually find a way to beat a grand opus out of it? And that the violin will become very much not at all what it is or ever will be… what kind of Towering Intellect sees in a violin a drum set?

Jerry Wilson of Goldfish and Clowns, which has a sleek new look, makes complementary points:
Sarah Palin is the mirror in which the wannabes see their insignificance. She doesn’t need the blogger prattlers or the Twitter twits or puffed-up pundits. She blows right past them, communicating directly with the people. The genuine media high fliers, the true high rollers — Limbaugh, Levin, Beck, Hannity — have both the intelligence to give her free reign and the humility to know her star shines far brighter than even theirs, wisely yielding the stage to her whenever possible. They understand the concept of serving the greater good, and act accordingly.


[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dan Collins and Rick Sheridan, Mis Chievous. Mis Chievous said: Loved this. RT @RickSheridan: Breathtakingly accurate piece on Palin at @vermontaigne blog. The Zen of Palin: http://bit.ly/9Rtuqu #tcot [...]
Well said, sir. The ideologues hate Sarah and would do so even if they could tell what she does or does not “understand” about public issues. But they can’t tell; she isn’t transparent to them in their omniscience. Like certain other politicians, she comments from a common sense viewpoint and reshapes arguments with sometimes-naive freshness. Refutations always carry the risk that the interlocutor’s real agenda will be exposed (as it it isn’t already). So, the only thing to do is to resort to venal personality detraction. By the time 2012 rolls around, Americans may have grown to like Sarah, but the reality is that whatever we have learned about her will be real. Should we care what she “knows”? Probably, but we have a good long time to observe her on the political scene before we have decisions to make. Let’s be patient about this. Meanwhile, the President’s charade will play itself out more fully and we’ll finally also comprehend what we ought to have discerned in the months prior to the last election.
Oh, but they hate her so. Marvel at this and the 6000 comments in a single day.
Brilliant. Thank you.
thx – maybe I will file this one under “even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes”
I loved that update from Jerry’s blog, Dan. His piece was so dead on as well. I really resent the fact that what I believe I see so clearly and try to point out to the attackers on the right is received as defense from a crazy “fan” who believes she can do no wrong.
It’s getting so old. I’m not backing down though. The criticism of Palin is mostly petty and she is held to a standard it seems that I’ve never seen before by critics on the right. I hope they get a clue.
Thanks, Darcy. This was an Enoch post. The more they go after her on specious grounds—whatever pretext will serve their ravenous hatred—the more powerful she grows.
She’s not my ideal presidential candidate, but I’m deeply offended by the vitriol that’s directed at her. For what?
Lori Z’s post today at NewsReal is all over it.
[...] On the same subject, a most highly recommended dissertation by Enoch Root at Piece Of Work In Progress. Share this [...]
The thing is, she is not my ideal presidential candidate either. I like her in this watchdog/motivational speaker role very much, though.
I did mean the first reply to Enoch!
Interesting post. Not sure I totally agree. The purpose of zen is to arrive at a place of enlightenment. I don’t think that’s the governmental archetypes of this age. Thanks for the opinion though.
don
editor
fromnowtozen.com
don, have you reached total consciousness? That would be nice if you have that going for ya!
Don – I was angling more for harmonious existence… an intuitive grace of being.
My Minnesota brother laughs laughs laughs and says fuck yeah I’ll vote for Pawlenty before Palin.
He really isn’t a big Pawlenty fan as these things go.
But you guys go ahead and vote your tribe.
um… meaning except for don and Mr. Dan.
I really should read all the other comments first, no?
But I’ll rescue my faux pas and jump out there and say but damn thor don’t got him a radar.
He was much more right about Palin than the blogs I go to were.
I’ll take vitriol over idolatry any day I think.
oh. except for Darcy, too. Darcy made me work for it though.
Not that I’m not glad she did.
*click, click, click*
[...]
Might you produce me with any additional resources on this matter?
I perform with these dogs and as far as animal behavior goes, I am a firm believer in nurture and coaching. I’ve met Jack Russell Terriers that I wouldn’t go around once again, but have certainly not had a poor expertise with an American Staffordshire Terrier. If you’re talking about their owners- nicely, that’s a different story. Human beings are creatures as well, and we tend to every have our personal suggestions about “moral concepts”.