21 Responses to “WHY DID TREACHER CROSS THE ROAD?”

  1. [...] at snarkandboobs, powip Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)spot the DifferenceA Good HeadAche [...]

  2. [...] at killtruck, powip Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)spot the DifferenceA Good HeadAche [...]

  3. That's Right says:

    Secret Service Runs Over Jim Treacher (UPDATE: State Department Runs Over Jim Treacher)…

  4. Joe says:

    This type of corruption really works me up. I doubt Treacher was targeted personnally. He was probably just some guy who got accidently hit by a Secret Service agent. But then the Secret Service agent (apparently) abuses his authority and tries to cover it up. WTF?

    If you did this and got caught it would be called hit and run and you would be going to jail. If you are in a cross walk you are in the right. End of story.

  5. Nice how the damned ticket says the hit and run occurred at 26th and M, not 22nd and M.

    And Media Matters? Their motto is “The Truth Never Matters.”

  6. Dustin says:

    I just don’t get why they would want to be this ugly to Treacher. He’s just a funny guy. He’s not reporting the news. This isn’t partisan.

    He was hurt real bad by a government vehicle and reported what he knew, which was that some said it was Secret Service and he never heard from the driver. That was obviously the truth. the driver failed to report himself at the scene, and he was State department security, which in a black SUV would be assumed to be Secret Service.

    What I don’t understand is: why is this defense even necessary? I read on these lefty blogs “he’s a teabagger, who cares if he’s hurt” and I wonder if these people are seriously that butthurt about the TEA party. Media Matters has absolutely no justification to report on something like this, or attempt to harm someone’s case. They know they are just being plain mean to someone who is going to have a hard time responding until he gets better.

    Why waste their time like that? Is partisanship really that big a deal? Most democrats believe that Bush “possibly” knew 9/11 was going to happen, and they can’t accept that a government security driver might try to CYA?

    Give me a break.

    • Kill Truck says:

      I didn’t even get to that balloonjuice thread. How messed up is it that the ugliest comments I’ve read were on a post that wasn’t even about Treacher. It was about Andrew Breitbart.

      I spent the week before dealing with the same lunatics over O’Keefe. They’re animals.

      • Dustin says:

        Balloon Juice. That’s exactly the thread I was talking about.

        I’d be ashamed to attract that many ‘like minded’ assholes. And “asshole” is the best way to describe that degree of anger at Treacher. I guess O’Keefe’s issues gave some folks an excuse to throw any fairness or civility out the window and they forgot to put their mask back on when Treacher’s damn knee was busted up in an accident.

        Pretty insane. I don’t even see the right saying stuff that bad about Murtha. Hope Treacher ignores all that and just gets on with his life.

  7. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dan Collins and Rick , Rick . Rick said: RT @kill_truck: Medlock converts to Islam, govt. apologizes http://bit.ly/9AEo78 #gwstreacher [...]

  8. General Tso's Chicken says:

    Balloon Juice sucks worse than thor’s mom.

  9. SDN says:

    Actually, Balloon Juice used to be a pretty good blog back in the day. Until it became an early example of what’s now known as “Lizard’s Syndrome” after it’s most famous sufferer. It’s sad.

  10. eddiebear says:

    one point that this whole deal illustrates is that, beyond any doubt, MediaMatters (especially with Eric Boehlert) is not a media watchdog group; they are as much of a hit piece/advocacy machine as anything coming out of the Blumenthal family.

    But why is MM making this their tempest of the moment? DO they feel that taking this story on will help forward a policy goal? Or, is this just an attempt to marginalize a well known conservative blogger and his new employer?

  11. dorkafork says:

    “That’s why the left has centered the debate (why is there even a debate?) on whether this was technically a hit and run.”

    I don’t know why there is a “debate” about it, I just figured Eric Boehlert still doesn’t know what a “hit and run” is.

  12. SarahW says:

    Who wrote the citation? When was it written and on what basis? A called-in complaint after the accident?
    The driver’s complaint? The unidentified driver’s complaint? How many statements were taken at the scene and who took them?

    Why did the Daily Caller get runaround asking for an accident report? Why were they told no report would be available for weeks; then told no report would be available at all?

    Why would there be no report on an accident with a seriously injured pedestrian?

    The driver, who was located through the number he left in the logs at the Daily Caller (failing to identify himself in any way) curiously conceded that Sean (Jim Treacher) “was
    not jaywalking” – but that “at the time of the accident” was outside of the crosswalk.
    Is that a weaseled claim, based on where JT was lying after having been (pardon) hit with a State Dept. employee’s giant steel car?

    I’m cheezed off with the slimy, bad-faith liability containment efforts used when the employee, through inattention or distraction, basically just screwed up and hurt someone trying to cross the street in the ordinary fashion.

    It’s disgraceful. By the way, tort reform would delay or JT out of his day in court or make it too risky to proceed. *SPOCK ON* Remember *SPOCK OFF*

  13. SarahW says:

    Sorry, forgot to close a tage.

  14. SarahW says:

    Also a tag.

  15. Gekkobear says:

    The MediaMatters thing gets me… but maybe I’m wrong.

    Let me hit Eric Boehlert with a car, then see what level of mental acuity he has. I’m just saying, since he expects 0 errors from a guy who just got hit with a car, maybe he can show us how it’s done.

    I won’t be leaving my name or information at the scene after I hit him. Eric has convinced me that I don’t need to if I you know, call it in later or something. I’ll call someone who isn’t him but knows him and just let them know I smacked him one or something when I get around to it.

    Sounds like a plan… I wonder when we can put this together.

  16. SarahW says:

    Isn’t it sort of a much of a muchness whether JT was hit by Secret Service or some other Federal agency security detail?

    I mean, a big ass government vehicle, supposed to be driven by a SUPER-DRIVER STATE SECURITY PERSON, that may have disappeared without leaving information about himself as the law demands, or only provided it after the fact by making stuff up to cover his ass (perhaps on advice of authority or government counsel)
    the big deal? (Besides driving carelessly enough to maim and kill people going about their business?)

    Cheezit Crackers.

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting

Monetize your love

ShareThis


Recent Comments

Twitter Updates

    Blogroll

    Site Stats



    Web Statistics