How Chicagoans Corrupt Their City Officials
It must be very hazardous to be a Chicago Alderman, as 30 of them have been "convicted of corruption or other crimes" in the past 36 years (handy chart here). Patrick Fitzgerald's office has apparently discovered the root of the problem: citizens are corrupting them.
Tom Bennett's post on the subject expresses a certain nagging doubt over Cal Boender's prosecutor's assertion that Alderman Isaac "Ike" Carothers, a Daley stalwart and once head of the Police and Fire Commission, was corrupted from a state of political innocence by the now-convicted developer, who is hoping to win the right to a retrial. Tom, himself a Chicago-area developer, noted that Carothers' father, long-ago Alderman William Carothers, was similarly convicted in 1984 for taking home improvements in exchange for favors. Here's what the Sun-Times has to say on the matter:
Boender is also accused of making third-party donations to Carothers' aunt, Cook County Circuit Judge Anita Rivkin-Carothers, when she made a run for Congress in 2004.
In the late 1990s, Rivkin-Carothers was attorney for Tina Olison, mother of Baby T -- the child who now lives with Ald. Edward Burke (14th) and his wife, Supreme Court Justice Anne Burke.
Carothers' father, former Ald. William Carothers (28th), went to prison in 1983 for extorting up to $32,500 in remodeling work for his ward office from the builders of Bethany Hospital.
Before the federal investigation of Isaac Carothers was made known last year, he was Daley's most outspoken African-American supporter in the City Council.
He coined the phrase "heavy lifters" to describe aldermen with the guts to support the $276.5 million tax package tied to Daley's 2008 budget and used the phrase to berate colleagues he saw as political cowards.
The speeches and Carothers' role in running a West Side army of city workers who delivered the vote for the mayor's handpicked candidates endeared Carothers to Daley.
Another Sun-Times article fleshes out the characterization:
Four years ago, Ike Carothers' name surfaced in connection with the Hired Truck scandal. During the trial that culminated in the 2006 conviction of Daley's former patronage chief, Carothers' name also appeared on an notorious "clout list" as the sponsor of nearly 100 city job seekers.
Ike Carothers is not likely to win any popularity contests among City Council colleagues, most of whom view him as a bully.
But, that's a label he's worn before.
In 1985, a federal judge ordered William Carothers to help pay $152,000 in damages for organizing from prison a campaign of physical violence and intimidation against a political opponent that involved Carothers' sons, who were both Cook County deputy sheriffs with access to guns.
At the time, U.S. District Judge Charles Kocoras said Issac Carothers appeared to be the ringleader and "organized their acts of intimidation" by force while the other son used his deputy's position to verbally threaten the plaintiffs. Isaac Carothers was ordered to pay $25,000 of the damages.
So, we are to believe that this sort of man was corrupted by a real-estate developer with no prior record? No wonder Carothers was never brought to the stand. He'd already cut his own deal, a reduced sentence in exchange for wearing a wire.
Now, remember Tom's analysis. Only Mayor Daley was in the position to "brick," or place the most restrictive use designation on the property that Boender was trying to sell. This he did after Boender applied to rezone the property, which had been manufacturing, but abandoned as part of the exodus of such businesses from Chicago, accelerated by onerous property taxes. The prosecutor's office argued that by receiving an exemption later, through Carothers' influence, Mr. Boender was able to sell the property for millions more than he otherwise would have. That's true, but it's true from the baseline that Daley had personally imposed on the property by "bricking" it, or giving it the most restrictive designation---the one that local developers call the "death sentence."
Like many other people, I am sickened by the Kelo decision, that governments may take properties to have them converted to uses that will enhance the tax base. The idea stems from the theory of "eminent domain," which says that properties ought to be put to their "best and highest uses." So, for example, a government can take a portion of a farmer's field and duly compensate him if a train line that will benefit people generally would be best routed through. If estimated tax revenues can be used as an imputed basis for determining the best and highest use, certainly an actual realization on the open market of a higher price suggests the same thing. If municipalities have such a right, they presumably must also have an obligation to reasonably determine best and highest use, perhaps most particularly in a city such as Chicago, that is deep, deep in the red---so deep in the red that Richard Daley sold the franchise to parking meters in the City to a contractor for $1.6 billion, that was to comprise a rainy day fund, then used it in its entirety to plug the gaping holes in the 2010 budget. However, that is not what they did in the case of the property that Tom Bennett bid for, which they sold for $1.3 million less than he bid, to a better-connected buyer.
In other words, the culture of corruption that marks Chicago real-estate dealings is in part created by a policy that says that the Mayor may, apparently at whim, devalue a property, then re-establish its value, by bricking it and unbricking it, without having to provide a plausible reason. Let us say that Mr. Boender were saddled with the property, and had to settle for a sizable loss. Perhaps he would grow tired of paying taxes on a property that he could find no tenant for, and simply cede it to the City. There would be nothing to prevent the Mayor from changing the zoning designation after selling it, through the CHA, to whichever political patrons might in his estimation best benefit. This ought to amount to an illegal taking, if there were anyone willing to enforce it.
This policy was designed to invite bribery; bribery did not invent the policy.
I am not saying that Cal Boender should have offered a bribe to former Alderman Carothers, and I understand why Fitzgerald's office might be willing to cut him a deal in exchange for his wearing a wire, but this business of placing the onus for Carothers' behavior on Boender goes too far. It simply is not plausible. It is, in my view, libelous. It says, in effect, that elected and appointed officials in government are less responsible for their behavior than private citizens, and that is an idea that is poisonous to democracy.
And any prosecutor who would deliberately deprive someone of his reputation in order to enhance his own is frankly performing a transaction that is as disgusting as the other cashing in that's done in Chicago.
Perfect Adjective for Gibbsy
All her plants were hydroponic.
All her sex was teledildonic.
Waxman To Threaten P&G
Sent from a friend who's worked for them for decades:
By Lou Pritchett, Procter & Gamble
A LETTER FROM A PROCTER AND GAMBLE EXECUTIVE TO THE PRESIDENT
Lou Pritchett is one of corporate America 's true living legends---an acclaimed author, dynamic teacher and one of the world's highest rated speakers. Successful corporate executives everywhere recognize him as the foremost leader in change management. Lou changed the way America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to be known as "partnering." Pritchett rose from soap salesman to Vice-President, Sales and Customer Development for Procter and
Gamble and over the course of 36 years, made corporate history.AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA
The Fierce Insurgency of Then
Obama is our Miraculous Fidel:
Here’s a UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) report on Cuba circa 1957: “One feature of the Cuban social structure is a large middle class,” it starts. “Cuban workers are more unionized (proportional to the population) than U.S. workers. The average wage for an 8-hour day in Cuba in 1957 is higher than for workers in Belgium, Denmark, France and Germany. Cuban labor receives 66.6 per cent of gross national income. In the U.S. the figure is 70 per cent, in Switzerland 64 per cent. 44 per cent of Cubans are covered by Social legislation, a higher percentage than in the U.S.”
In 1958, Cuba had a higher per-capita income than Austria and Japan. Cuban industrial workers had the 8th highest wages in the world. In the 1950’s Cuban stevedores earned more per hour than their counterparts in New Orleans and San Francisco.
The Anti-Batista rebellion (not revolution) was staffed and led overwhelmingly by college students and professionals. Unemployed lawyers were prominent (take Fidel Castro himself). Here’s the makeup of the “peasant revolution’s” first cabinet, drawn from the leaders in the Anti-Batista fight: 7 lawyers, 2 University professors, 3 University students, 1 doctor, 1 engineer, 1 architect, 1 former city mayor and a Colonel who defected from the Batista Army. A notoriously “bourgeois” bunch as Che himself might have put it.
By 1961 however, workers and campesinos (country folk)-made up the overwhelming bulk of the anti-Castroite rebels, especially the guerrillas in the Escambray mountains. That (genuine) guerrilla war would REALLY make for an action-packed and gut-wrenching war movie. Hear that, Messieurs Soderbergh and del Toro?
If by some miracle such a movie ever got made, you can bet these learned critics would pan it too. Who ever heard of poor country-folk fighting against their benefactors Fidel and Che?
That'll teach Bushtista.
The Inconvenient Spirit of Liberty!
Dan update: Serr8d's wrong about this Hendrix post being pretty good. It's awesome. I'm considering it a birthday gift. And here's Serr's take on the issue, with some good advice beginning with "f".
Thanks, too, to the ever excellent William Teach for the link up. His and Larwyn's are two Sunday round-ups I always check, along with Smitty's.
Sexual Abuse Is Not a Catholic Franchise
Today's my birthday, as I'd earlier announced, as well as Palm Sunday, so the headlines in the MSM are all about Holy Week opening amidst charges of sex abuse cover-ups that may even touch on the Pope himself. Benedict has dismissed the charges, and between the NYT and the Pope, on a matter of truthfulness, please forgive me if I go with the Pope. Religion hater Christopher Hitchens has called for the US to cut off political relations with the Vatican, and yesterday True/Slant writer Matt Taibbi stated that the Catholic Church was a criminal enterprise and ought to be sued under RICO.
Well, that's an interesting theory. But are public schools a criminal enterprise, as well? Because I believe that despite all the talk about celibacy being the root of the trouble for the Catholic Church, one would find that incidences of abuse and cover-up are at least as widespread among public schools. I realize that this is just a hunch, but it demonstrates the confirmation bias at play that none of the MSM is interested in performing the actual research that would be necessary either to confirm or deny the supposition.
What I can say is that I believe that if the MSM were to conduct such research and to publicize it, suddenly there would be an explosion of class action suits against districts and teacher-accreditation organizations. That in turn would lead to further ferreting out of horrible instances of cover-ups and transfers, going back in time to the 1950s and earlier, some of which would be true, some not, but most settled out of court. There would be congressional hearings, and Christopher Hitchens would be calling for the US government to break off diplomatic relations with the Secretary of Education (who is a corrupt bastard, anyway). A good start would be a blog for survivors of public school sex abuse. Heck, we'll even set it up for someone.
Prove me wrong.
Oh, and today is Evil Giraffe's birthday, too, so go give him some comment love and hit his tip jar, too! Whelp that he is.
BTW, Reuters . . . is the Church really "reeling," compared to the US or the MSM? Really?
Would you care to know why that's so? Here are dozens of reasons.
Psychopaths Are Crack Monkeys
Scientists have long known what psychopaths lack: emotions like empathy, fear and remorse. Now, a new study focuses on what they may have, a brain abnormality that may lead them to seek rewards like money, sex or fame at any cost.
Needed: A Blow-by-Blow History of HCR
I realize that this is going to be a long, sometimes boring sequel to Upton Sinclair's The Jungle, but we need an historical look at how this was brought about, beginning with the election (flashing back to previous initiatives), the horse trading, who wrote it, how provisions got in, what got left out and why, through the parliamentary maneuvering and passage. What I'd like to see is one honest conservative---say, Byron York---and one honest liberal---I don't know---to work on this collaboratively, using their sources, while the memories are still fresh. Though they might be hauled in front of the Star Chamber if Waxman doesn't like what they say.
And thanks to Miss Attila for the shout out to Evil Giraffe and me, and the linky love from Carol.







