POWIP Piece of Work In Progress

14Jun/103

Boob Job [UPDATE]

Writing in the Village Voice, Roy Edroso is upset that Sarah Palin managed to turn the boob job rumor on her critics:

But wasn't the implant story an unwelcome distraction from it? No, because for the Palin machine, there are no distractions -- anything that happens, however negative it may seem to normal people, can be repurposed in support of her cause. This is, after all, the woman who claimed quitting political office was about "what is best for Alaska."

Whereas the White House pulling strings to try to keep Arlen Specter around was all about principle.

Yep. Palin Machine. Like . . . Daley Machine.

I'm not going to rehearse the insanity of Atlantic blogger/columnist Andrew Sullivan and his vagino-spelunking, because you're all familiar with that, although it's interesting that in his link-filled article Edroso manages to segregate out that continuing spectacle of dementia. Instead, I'd like to connect this with the left's meltdown over Carrie Prejean's pageant-paid boob job, which the California pageant organization later attempted to repossess.

Women are, of course, free to have breast enhancement or reduction as they please. But if you're a conservative woman, refabrication of your breasts synecdochically means that you are false, deceptive, inauthentic. And this is really what the attack on Palin's tits was about. Pelosi's plastic surgery doesn't mean a thing to these people, but Palin? Different story.

See, the thing is, if you're conservative, you're held to a different standard of authenticity. You can't possibly be black and conservative. That makes you an Oreo, right? But Bill Clinton was the first black president, in part because he probably screwed more black women than Obama did. That makes him an Oero.

If someone wants to declare a different gender than the one imposed on him/her by the essentialist paradigms of the social construction of sex on his/her passport, though, have at it. It would be repressive to infer that that wasn't authentic. Got it? Good.

UPDATE: Malkin on the tolerant left.

Dan Collins

Dan Collins is a dude who blogs. He used to blog elsewhere. Now he blogs here.

Website - More Posts

Share
14Jun/100

Oh my; 49% of Americans think Democrats are too liberal

The Brain Trust?

That is, according to the notoriously Reich-wing OberGruppenFuhrer McPollster...Gallup ?!? I mean, I'm shocked, SHOCKED! at this result, as I'm sure you are too.

Not only is this figure currently signifigant, it is only 1 point lower than the all time high of 50% recorded...wait for it...following the upset 1994 mid-term elections !

In the past two years, Americans have become increasingly likely to describe the Democratic Party’s views as “too liberal” (49%), and less likely to say its views are “about right” (38%). Americans’ views of the Republican Party, on the other hand, have moderated slightly, with a dip in the percentage saying the GOP is too conservative from 43% last year to 40% today, and an increase in the percentage saying it is about right, from 34% to 41%.

The recent increase in perceptions of the Democratic Party as too liberal could be a response to the expansion in government spending since President Barack Obama took office, most notably regarding the economic stimulus and healthcare legislation.

The 49% of Americans who now believe the Democratic Party’s views are too liberal is one percentage point below the 50% Gallup measured after the 1994 elections, the all-time high in the trend question first asked in 1992.

This doesn't look too good for the most ethical party-EVAR!-going into the midterm election cycle.  So, not only have O!&Co. pretty much lost the independants, with their approval deficit standing at 19% (33/52 on Democrat ideological position "about right" vs. too liberal), but this seems to auger a coming fail in their strategy to paint the Republicans as too extreme and to, once again, blame the nation's woes on Boooooooooooooooosh!

Cap'n Ed at Hot air opines that those strategeries might have had a shot before the post-partisan President and most Transparent!, Effective!, and Ethical! Congress rammed through Obamacare, and he goes on to observe:

In November 1994, the split for “too liberal/about right” was 42/40.  Post-election, it was 50/32.  That bodes ill for Democrats in this cycle as it stands today — but Democrats haven’t stopped spending in 2010, either.  If Barbara Boxer and Harry Reid try pushing cap-and-tax through the Senate, they may get to the 1994 post-election number sooner.

Looks like if public opinion keeps trending this way then, you know, some of the usual suspects in Washington are gonna have to start thinking about getting a real job...

(H/T Hot Air on the story, and to Ace on the Obergruppenfuhrer McPollster snark!)

Share
14Jun/101

My Boobs Are Real

Somehow put me in mind of The Go-Gos.

Can we move on, now, or are there other Sarah Palin erogenous zones that need to be investigated?

Dan Collins

Dan Collins is a dude who blogs. He used to blog elsewhere. Now he blogs here.

Website - More Posts

Share
14Jun/103

When Congresscritters Attack – The Bob Etheridge, D-NC Edition [updatedx2]

Please tell me the difference between this...

And this.

Also, the kid has excellent self-control - I would have beaten the shit out of that old geezer, Bob Etheridge (D - NC) - a good left hook is what the doctor orders.

What the hell is going on? Is this part of the "in yo grill" campaign?

UPDATED X1 - WEIRD - in an effort to serve the DNC and His Highness, El Presidente Obama from embarrassment, it appears that the video has been wiped from YouTube.

Well, here you go... on a more free speech friendly platform.

Update x2- the ass-face's opponent - don't know about her hair, but am following Renee Ellmers on twitter now. @Renee4Congress

H/T Fishman

Enoch_Root

AKA. Bobby Donn Brubaker (the most popular man in Mesa, AZ), the Umbrella of Terror, Jack Ketch.

Website - More Posts

Share
13Jun/101

David Paterson and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Really Bad Idea

Now, I've come across a lot of really bad ideas in public pensions: retirement eligibility at age 50; benefit formulas that make it easy to boost the pension amount; all sorts of “clever”plans whereby employees get cash lump sums on retirement; COLAs where the pension payments go up up up with no cap; pension obligation bonds where the state issues bonds to get money to use as “contributions” to their pension plans [I think I still haven't gotten around to explaining POBs, which are a work of something, I tell you whut].

But Gov. Paterson, you've outdone everybody else:

Gov. David A. Paterson and legislative leaders have tentatively agreed to allow the state and municipalities to borrow nearly $6 billion to help them make their required annual payments to the state pension fund.

And, in classic budgetary sleight-of-hand, they will borrow the money to make the payments to the pension fund — from the same pension fund.

Forget about math for a moment. Forget about “cleverness”. I want to contrast this to the Social Security Trust Fund, which is a not-so-polite fiction that the government will pay back money it owes to itself. The grand thing about the SocSec Trust Fund is that they've gone through a lot of work to make people believe that it really means something – the Treasury bonds in the Trust Fund, unlike the normal Treasuries that you buy electronically and get various info to indicate how much you own, are printed on paper. Like that makes it real. Ha ha ha.

So here is what the SocSec Trust Fund is: people pay taxes now, supposedly designated for SocSec benefits... but those taxes [up til recently] have been greater than SocSec outflow. So Congress just spends that money on something else [and even after those extra taxes, there's still a deficit].

This is like me taking money out of my left pocket which I was using to save up for retirement, sticking it in my right pocket, tell my left pocket I'd rather owe it to that pocket than cheat it out of the money, and then take that right pocket money to buy some wine. And then buy some more stuff on my credit card.

Let's compare this to Paterson's proposal. There, I'd be taking money out of my left pocket, sticking it into my right pocket, and then sticking it back in my left pocket and then pretending that my retirement savings have at all increased.

While some people still believe in Santa Claus and the Social Security Trust Fund, no one is going to be fooled by Paterson. Why even bother?

Meep

Meep is a member of the Irish Catholic mafia, having a suspiciously high number of green-eyed, red-haired friends. While she doesn’t have red hair herself [except when she goes into the sun (rare for any vampire)], she does have green eyes. She’s a raving Papist and is a life actuary on the side [i.e., she counts dead people]. An amateur pain-in-the-ass [willing to go pro!], she likes covering retirement, mortality, math, and education issues.

Share
13Jun/105

Nathan Tabor, Assaulted by Obamaist Union Thug, Charged with Assault for Defending Self and Wife

YouTube, magistrates defend Holder Doctrine. Interview at Breitbart.tv.

Liberal civil rights lawyers argue that because “a history of official discrimination” can be one subsidiary factor in voting cases it “wipes out every other factor” and prohibits cases from being brought against blacks. And further, that since “socio-economic” factors can be considered in determining whether voting discrimination has occurred, these cases cannot be brought against black defendants until there is economic parity between blacks and whites. Such attorneys use phrases like “traditional civil rights cases” and “traditional civil rights victims” to signal that only minority victims and white perpetrators concern them. Justice sources tell me that career attorneys have been “assured” that cases against minority defendants won’t be brought. In testimony before the civil rights commission, Thomas Perez denied he was aware of any such conversations or sentiments.

To date the Democratic Congress has exercised virtually no oversight over either the Panther case or the department’s civil rights enforcement approach generally. The OPR investigation shows no sign of completion. Neither Holder nor Perrelli has been questioned in depth about his participation in the case or about the allegations that Justice attorneys don’t intend to enforce civil rights laws against anyone other than white defendants.

Smith and Wolf, who just this week fired off two-dozen questions to Attorney General Eric Holder, continue to pursue the case, but without Democratic support they cannot subpoena either witnesses or documents. That may change after the November election. If the House of Representatives or Senate flips to Republican control and new committee chairmen decide to engage in actual oversight, Perrelli and Holder may find themselves forced by subpoenas to tell the complete NBPP story and explain why Obama’s Justice Department believes the civil rights laws exist only to protect citizens of certain races.

Save-A-Life Foundation gets Chicago judge to throw whistleblower in jail.

Obamaists contaminate report on offshore drilling. Offshore platforms moving to Brazil (which works out nicely for Soros).

As of May 24th, NASA was providing satellite images of spill:

Do they still?

Transparency. Competence.

Dan Collins

Dan Collins is a dude who blogs. He used to blog elsewhere. Now he blogs here.

Website - More Posts

Share
13Jun/105

Mosab Yousef, Pam Geller, New Black Panthers, & ct.

Little Miss Attila asks that we link to the new site supporting Mosab Yousef's bid for asylum. If you're not familiar with the case, he's a convert to Christianity whose father is a founding member of Hamas. So far, his petitions for asylum have been denied, though his claim is significantly better than, for example, Auntie Zeituni's. We wonder why.

Please raise a stink about this, as his hearing is fast approaching: June 30th. Make it clear to Holder that if he's deported and murdered (the latter seeming almost inevitable in the wake of the former), we will hold him and the Obama administration responsible.

Pam Geller's been booted off of PayPal. Hawala get money to her?

NBP:

The Panthers like to tout their “victory” and parrot the Obama Justice Department’s line that the case was unmeritorious. The party held a national convention in Atlanta over Memorial Day weekend (sponsored and attended by the once mainstream Southern Christian Leadership Conference and a grab bag of socialist and anti-Semitic figures). Its website boasts: “The New Black Panther Party has been embroiled in a battle between Republican Congressmen and the U.S. Department of Justice over a ‘voter intimidation’ scandal for the last 18 months. During these 18 months right wing and Republican Newspaper and Electronic media have gone to exhaustive lengths to discredit and slander the New Black Panther Party and its Chairman and Attorney Malik Zulu Shabazz.”

But on June 4, J. Christian Adams, a veteran lawyer in Justice’s voting section and a key member of the trial team, resigned. His reasons were spelled out in a letter that also noted that the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was investigating the dismissal, had subpoenaed him and Coates, but their superiors, in violation of federal law, had ordered them not to testify. He noted that “the defendants in the New Black Panther lawsuit have become increasingly belligerent in their rhetoric toward the attorneys who brought the case. .  .  . Their grievances toward us generally echo the assertions [by Justice Department officials] that the facts and law did not support the lawsuit against them.” Coates, too, has left the Voting Section, moving to South Carolina to work in the U.S. attorney’s office. Last Friday, the civil rights commission’s general counsel, David Blackwood, announced that he had received an email from Christian Adams’s attorney stating that Adams is now available to provide information to the commission. Commissioner Todd Graziano said they would schedule Adams’s appearance at a public hearing as soon as possible as the commission had been seeking his testimony for many months.

With Adams’s resignation and letter, a clearer picture is finally emerging of what led to the dismissal of the case, the actions of DoJ political appointees, the department’s misrepresentations about the case, and the Obama administration’s approach to civil rights enforcement.

Read the whole thing.

What's the message here?

[via Newsalert]

Nature red in tooth and . . . oy.

Dan Collins

Dan Collins is a dude who blogs. He used to blog elsewhere. Now he blogs here.

Website - More Posts

Share
12Jun/106

Own It – Barack Otroleum

BARACK OTROLEUM

Curious. Every Google search I conduct for "Obama on Katrina Response" or "Obama on Bush Administration Katrina" or anything to do with articles relating to Obama's criticism of Katrina response... is, well, a field of dead links and missing pages.

The point being of course was I was going to do some find and replace of some of Obama's statements on Katrina - in order to demon-strate the hOpe-Ocrisy of the New Messiah.

But things keep seeming to vanish. Videos of Black Union Thugs beating on peaceful White Demonstrators, etc. Why, it's enough to generate conspiracy theories in the minds of right-wing thuggernauts like myself.

This is in part why Google should be considered less benign than most believe the company to be.

Where did they move their world headquarters to again?

Me, I am switching to Yahoo! Search from here on out...

But, I am keeping my Gmail for now.

Maybe it's time for a Conservative Search Engine.

Lots of good advice out there...

Enoch_Root

AKA. Bobby Donn Brubaker (the most popular man in Mesa, AZ), the Umbrella of Terror, Jack Ketch.

Website - More Posts

Share
12Jun/100

And now, for the third stanza

In previous posts, I covered my favorite stanza of the Star-Spangled Banner.

In honor of today's U.S.-Britain match at the World Cup, I present to you the third stanza:

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul footstep's pollution.

No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave,
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

No hard feelings, Britain.

For further patriotism, check out a pic of the original broadside with the full lyrics. which has a preface explaining the story behind its composition.

Meep

Meep is a member of the Irish Catholic mafia, having a suspiciously high number of green-eyed, red-haired friends. While she doesn’t have red hair herself [except when she goes into the sun (rare for any vampire)], she does have green eyes. She’s a raving Papist and is a life actuary on the side [i.e., she counts dead people]. An amateur pain-in-the-ass [willing to go pro!], she likes covering retirement, mortality, math, and education issues.

Share
11Jun/103

Almost as Cool as That Water Trick

Oh, ye of little faith. Do not fear... for it is I.

PSHOP BY GUEST CHOPPER - AJV

Enoch_Root

AKA. Bobby Donn Brubaker (the most popular man in Mesa, AZ), the Umbrella of Terror, Jack Ketch.

Website - More Posts

Share

Switch to our mobile site