That’s the Way We Do It In a Capitalist Society!
So today Chelsea Clinton is getting married. I heard somewhere that her CAKE cost $11,000. WOW...I hope that cake made itself. lol But that really isn't my point here. My point is..why am I hearing anyone that loves Capitalism bitch about how much is being spent on this wedding? If I had 5M dollars and my niece wanted a 5M dollar wedding..I'd give it to her. I personally don't understand spending that much on a dress you're only gonna wear once and things that will be gone by the end of the day like flowers, cake and chicken..but that's just me. I didn't hear anyone complain about how much Rush's last wedding cost....does anyone even know? Elton John was there...I'm guessing a buttload of money. But he has a buttload of money and in a free, capitalist society, if you want to pile your money in the front yard and set it on fire...that's your right.
I get so irritated, (to the point of wanting to punch people in the face) listening to people like Garafolo, Pelosi, and that crowd talk about "evil successful, rich, white people"...like they aren't successful, rich and white. And listening to them talk about "redistribution of wealth, and giving back" when they mean everyone but them. I get just as irritated listening to people in "our crowd" begrudge a woman, whose Daddy has the bucks, the wedding she wants.
So, Chelsea I hope your wedding is everything you hoped for and dreamed about when you were a little girl. And, I hope your marriage is a fun, interesting, strong, and lasting one.
Today on craigslist: the weirdest mixer ever
How dumb. Lonely do-gooders sign up to do volunteer work and to try get some from the other volunteers. I guess. I don't really know what else to say.
From craigslist New York:
Help Someone, Meet Someone: We help good people meet good people while doing good things
At Singles for Service we believe that to build a successful relationship with someone you need to get to know the real them, and they need to get to know the real you. There is no better way to do that then by working with someone side by side to help the community. You don’t have to worry about what you’re going to wear, where you’re going to go, or who is going to pay. You can just be yourself. Our events create a positive atmosphere that brings out the best in people and helps to break the ice.
You May Wonder Why I Haven’t Commented on ‘Mongrel’
Briefly, it's because I don't give a shit. I know what the dummy was trying to say. Hey, I get where Phineas is coming from, too, and turn about is fair play, I guess, but . . .
The real outrage is that his actions continually belie his post-racial posturing. Just today, Leahy said that he's not supporting any investigation into the New Black Panther fiasco at DOJ, for reasons that are entirely ludicrous. Shirley Sherrod, canned and then rehired by the White House, lionized by CNN, turns out not only to be the kind of racialist dimwit the Breitbart tape suggested, but also a stone cold entitlement whore who selfishly games the system.
Thanks to CNN and the continual lying of morons like Howard Dean, she's now an albatross tied tightly around the White House's neck. And as Jeff notes, eloquently, this circus isn't going to do the Democrats any favors. She's the Democrats' new Joe the Plumber, but without the wit, charm and intellect. And with a lot more venality. By the time this is over, she's going to hate Eric Boehlert for talking her into this.
Obama likes Pigford politics. Pigford politics likes Shirleys Sherrod. Typical white people? We're tired of this crap, though all of us being mongrels ought to simplify the census, don't you think?
Pshaw, I ain't no mongrel. I'm a AKC registered Crackerdoodle.
UPDATE: They're trying to back off, now at CNN. Don Lemon talks about the pain and suffering portion of their settlement (~300k between them), but doesn't mention the 13 million bucks for the co-op. Just like a relative (how distant, we don't know) who was killed by a white man became Ms. Sherrod's father, for Joan Walsh, I think it was.
You Lie? You Suck!
Ace has the story about how the House Ethics Committee Democrats are recommending that Charlie Rangel be subjected to a possible reprimand over his 13 ethics violation accusations. As he points out, that's the least serious discipline available, under expulsion or censure.
You may recall that Congressman Joe Wilson was reprimanded for yelling "You lie!" to the President regarding health care provisions. It was found that the President was indeed lying---legislators stayed up all night fixing the language to support their charge---but Wilson was reprimanded anyway. So stating a truth, albeit disrespectfully, during a joint session of Contress is presumably, in the eyes of these Democrats, on a par of severity with tax evasion, keeping multiple rent controlled premises, accepting prohibited gifts from lobbyists, and the rest of the charges. Mind you, I think they had to overlook some of the more minor infractions to come up with just 13.
Gosh, it must be nice to be a public servant. In terms of reaping benefits without reciprocal responsibilities, it might even be better than being an illegal alien. And you're especially exempt from responsibilities if you're the Chair of Ways and Means.
But, hey, what's this? It turns out that in order to prevent federal monies to be used for abortion, the President has had to sign an executive order establishing a temporary ban, even though we were assured over and over that there would be (read my lips!) no federal funding for abortion. Moreover, the President indicates that this ban is in no way to be considered permanent. It's just for now. I'm sure there's a principled reason for that.
Anybody who recommends mere reprimand for Charlie Rangel needs to go away ASAP. Oh, and you suck, too. Anyone in the MSM who doesn't get up on their chair and scream about this should be done, too.
And Romney? If this is true, you can fuck off. I assume Graham already has.
The “back-door” administration [UPDATED]
Is considering an initiative to advance their immigration agenda without, oh, say, having to consult that pesky Congress:
With Congress gridlocked on an immigration bill, the Obama administration is considering using a back door to stop deporting many illegal immigrants - what a draft government memo said could be "a non-legislative version of amnesty."
The memo, addressed to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Director Alejandro Mayorkas and written by four agency staffers, lists tools it says the administration has to "reduce the threat of removal" for many illegal immigrants who have run afoul of immigration authorities.
"In the absence of comprehensive immigration reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance and regulations, exercising discretion with regard to parole-in-place, deferred action and the issuance of Notices to Appear," the staffers wrote in the memo, which was obtained by Sen. Charles E. Grassley, Iowa Republican.
The memo suggests that in-depth discussions have occurred on how to keep many illegal immigrants in the country, which would be at least a temporary alternative to the proposals Democrats in Congress have made to legalize illegal immigrants.
Mr. Grassley said it confirms his fears that the administration is trying an end-run around Congress.
Remember when it was en vogue to criticize Boooooooooooosh! for being a fascist dictatorial leader who was intent on Shredding! the Constitution? I wonder why we're not hearing that same uproar from the usual suspects over this? Just askin'...
Oh, and, remember how the same eeeevollll despot wanted to invade everyone's privacy? Well, it seems that along with the other Boooooooooosh! policies he has quietly kept in place, or expanded, his Imperial benevolence, Lord Obamus, has decided the FBI shouldn't need to consult the court in order to access internet records of individuals activities and contacts:
The Obama administration is seeking to make it easier for the FBI to compel companies to turn over records of an individual’s Internet activity without a court order if agents deem the information relevant to a terrorism or intelligence investigation.
The administration wants to add just four words — “electronic communication transactional records” — to a list of items that the law says the FBI may demand without a judge’s approval. Government lawyers say this category of information includes the addresses to which an Internet user sends e-mail; the times and dates e-mail was sent and received; and possibly a user’s browser history. It does not include, the lawyers hasten to point out, the “content” of e-mail or other Internet communication.
*Whew* That's a relief. At least they're not looking to read the actual text of our private communications-yet; I guess that will come in the next increment of "progress"
This must be more of that New Kind of Politics!, or maybe the Transparency! Obama spoke about during campaign 2008. Just Words?!? Well, you make the call.
I won't go into the wonky details, but according to my lovely wife the ADA, records such as these can already easily obtained by order of a judge very quickly just by showing that they're needed as part of an ongoing investigation. So neither of us can understand the need to circumvent the usual judiciary. So while we can all agree on the validity of combatting terrorism, it seems to me at least that there is already an efficient method in place to get this very information, by simply talking to a judge. But as always, YMMV.
New.Kind.of.Politics...
Change! you can believe in...
Just keep repeating that mantra; you know, for the hope !
Update: According to White House spokes-nozzle Robert Gibbs, Obama doesn't even support amnesty, let alone have any secret plan for using regulatory measures to effectively allow it. Sure he doesn't Bobby, sure...I believe you. I also still put teeth under my pillow so I can be reimbursed by the tooth fairy, and send my wish Christmas lists to Santy Claus each year.
Do you believe him kind reader? I mean, if you do I have a friend who's got a bitchin' bridge in Brooklyn he says he'll part with cheap. Let me know if you're interested.
(Image courtesy of Moonbattery)
Heartache!
Though admittedly not as hurtful as when I found out that most F-14s at the boneyard would be shredded, in the interest of preventing the Iranians from getting parts for their small, but no less potentially threatening, complement of Tomcats via unscrupulous middlemen.
Still, seeing this image among those in this photo essay of "the boneyard" in Tuscon is like seeing one's former love in a strange and unfamiliar setting. But enough Drama...If you have time, check out the photo spread. There are some fascinating vehicles there, from aircraft to space vehicles, stored in the desert where the conditions are the most conducive.
In the picture I can make out the aircraft's tail codes, and, indeed, it was part of CVW-8, the air wing that my beloved VF-84 was part of. But this particular Tomcat appears to have belonged to Fighting 31, the "Tomcatters". And that's about all I can say, except that I presume this is an F-14D.
Oh, and that even wrapped in protective plastic, she is still a sight for these sore eyes...
"Hey baby, it's been a long time...The years have definitely been good to you, because you're as beautiful as ever..."
(H/T NeptunusLex)
Today on craigslist: A bus fit for a cowardly world leader
In honor of President Obama's misguided appearance on The View I thought we'd check out what's for sale in our Dear Leader's "home state" ;o ;o ;o of Hawaii. You guys, I think I found THE bus. What an ideal place to unwind while still making sure your dead grandma, domestic terrorist/mentor, clergy and former employees stay WHERE THEY BELONG. Great for those working vacations too.
1999 CRYSTAL LIMO BUS. READY TO MAKE MONEY GREAT FOR TOURS /WEDDINGS/ PROMS/CONCERTS/HANA TRIPS/FISHING TRIPS/ NIGHT OUTS/AIRPORTS/GOLF OUTINGS/ RENTS FROM $75.00 PER HOUR TO $200.00 PER HOUR BE YOUR OWN BOSS.HOLDS 14-16 PASSENGERS. CAN BRING IN $1000.00 IN ONE DAY. GREAT JOB MEET NEW PEOPLE EVERY DAY.
- Location: LAHAINA
- it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
Memo to playahz: lying for sex can get you jail time as well
JERUSALEM – Lying for sex. It happens all the time.
Yet a married Palestinian man has been ordered jailed for 18 months for having sex with an Israeli woman after giving her the impression he too was Jewish, as well as single and interested in a relationship.
His conviction of "rape by deception" has drawn charges of racism and questions about whether courts should be delving into this fraught topic.
Saber Qashor, a 30-year-old father of two, says he was approached by the woman in September 2008 on a downtown Jerusalem street where he had parked his motorcycle, and introduced himself as "Dudu," a common Israeli Jewish nickname.
Within half an hour they were having sex in a Jerusalem office building stairwell.
[empasis-ed.]
Within a half hour !?! What was she thinking? That this was an episode of "Big Brother", or an MTV reality show? Either this dude, Dudu, is the smoothest guy in the known universe, armed with a golden pick-up line, or, well...
I won't go there.
But the Judge in the case saw matters, er, clearly
"If she hadn't thought the accused was a single Jewish man interested in a serious romantic relationship, she would not have cooperated," Judge Zvi Segal wrote in sentencing Qashor. The court must protect the public from "sophisticated and slick-tongued criminals who would lead innocent victims astray, at the unbearable price of the sanctity of their bodies and souls."
"Innocent victims"... Ones who "cooperate" 30 minutes later in an office building stairwell. Well, the judge's pronouncement is a construct that should cause sphincter tightening and member shrinkage in singles-bar-sharks everywhere. Because it could soon be coming to a place near you.
A bill before the Massachusetts state legislature would target those who employ deceit — and not just physical force — to engage in sex. But it's aimed at sociopaths, not people who falsely boast of being doctors or sports stars, says its sponsor, Rep. Peter Koutoujian.
Massachusetts...Will there be a Kennedy exemption, I wonder? And, how long before other deep-blue states pass similar laws? It certainly wouldn't surprise me if NOW forced this into the national Democratic platform.
So, just to recap, real Tort reform is out of bounds, the SEC no longer has to honor FOIA requests, Massachusetts has passed a law subordinating the choice of that states voters to the winner of the national popular vote, and they may make lying for conquest illegal...
All I can say is young men better start taking certified copies of their CV with them to the club. And, if by some chance they find themselves in a courtroom, accused of a similar offense, where a judge is questioning them as to their intentions, remember the legal wisdom once proferred by Redd Foxx when in a similar situation:
"Your honor, I never promised that woman I'd take her to Florida; I just said I was goin' to tampa with her ..."
Sage, indeed.
Couldn’t Help Meself – Tomorrow’s SuperBand [UPDATEx1]
Kaiser and the Vaginas
Predictable, no-offense-given, pop rock for the masses!
Song Titles?
UPDATEx1
You know, guinsPen offers the following in the comments:
You’ve asked for song titles, yet only [alternate] band names have been offered.
Life’s funny like that.
Yes, I spose guins is correct. And sposing guins sposes correctly, guins offers another... band name.
Grandmaster Crack and the Family Ho.
Which is not bad at all... for an alternate band name - but certainly not a decent song title.
All of you deserve a FAIL. Starting with Dan.
Confirmed! Obama’s “View” appearance a cynical ploy to woo soccer moms
Safely back into the Democrat fold, where they really belong anyway, right? I apologize, dear reader, for seemingly obsessing over this like AllahP over Meghan McCain, but the smarminess of this ploy, the gall, the willingness to further diminish and debase of the Presidency is firmly stuck in my craw.
Unlike most guests who come to ABC's "The View," President Obama does not have a new movie, album or reality show to promote.
Instead, he's promoting himself and his agenda, sitting in the hot seat of the daytime talk show in an effort, once again, to go beyond the traditional media filter and speak directly to the American people, especially women.
Obama's Thursday appearance was taped today and will be his third on the show. It is his first as president -- indeed it is the first appearance of any sitting president on a daytime TV talk show.
So why sit down with "The View's" feisty and opinionated five hosts in the first place?
On Tuesday, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the decision was made to put the president on "The View" because it provides an opportunity "to talk to people where they are."
The president's approval ratings have hit new lows, according to the latest Washington Post-ABC News poll. Nearly six in 10 Americans say they lack confidence in the president to make the right decisions for the country, and a majority doubts his handling of the economy.
The ABC daytime program is unique because it is hosted by five women and its audience skews heavily female -- a voting group that has trended Democrat and went for Obama 56-43 over Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in the 2008 presidential election.
As Obama's overall approval ratings have dropped, he also has lost support from women, from a high of 72 percent support in February 2009 when he was still glowing from the presidential campaign and inauguration to an approval of 51 percent today.
So even ABC's own site doesn't attempt to sugar coat the President's purely political ploy. My favorite line? The one that characterized the show's hosts as "5 feisty and opinionated women". Puh-leez. It's more like 4 uber-libs and a token conservative. Based on their own words it is crystal clear that the only thing the Obama bunch really values about women are their potential votes, and they believe that to earn them all they need to do is have O! get his "Mack" on
Jessica Coen, editor of Jezebel.com, a popular website aimed at women, sees "The View" appearance as a prime opportunity for Obama to show some personality and "lay on the charm," which she feels has been in short supply given recent challenges.
"You go on 'The View' and you sit Obama down with these women and some of them may fawn on him; some may not. But either way he's going to be charming," said Coen. "The target audience for 'The View' is going to appreciate and be reminded of Barack Obama's personality when he goes out here." [emphasis-ed.]
O.M.G...In all my years of flying high performance fighters I never needed a barf bag; certainly not like I do now, after reading these passages.
And furthermore, I'd like to stress to the women out there that Barack Obama, and the Democrat party, believes that his good looks, demeanor, personality, and charm trump, you know, actual issues with you all. That women don't really worry their pretty little heads about issues, fiddle-dee-dee; why pesky thinking might give you the vapors, a migraine, and cause wrinkles ! No, what truly, and completely, influences women voters is simply how "smooth" a politician comes off. Hah!, if that were so, Billy Dee Williams would have been the first black President 25 years ago...
The Financial times sees through the charade to the underying political play.
When Barack Obama appears on Thursday on the homey set of The View, all couches and coffee cups, he can expect laughs and soft questions from “the ladies” – led by television mavens Barbara Walters and Whoopi Goldberg.
Mr Obama’s administration, facing dismal marks even from friendly pollsters, is making a new push to talk to Middle America, trying to recapture some of his old campaign magic before November’s midterm Congressional elections. And all without having to go through the pesky medium of the White House press corps.
Hence the new drive to present Mr Obama as a regular guy, sitting on a couch talking about his daughters with a bunch of moms. Before heading to the studio for the show’s taping on Wednesday he visited the Tastee Sub Shop in New Jersey, another high-calorie photo opp for a president once derided for his penchant for arugula (rocket).
All this is aimed at reminding voters why they turned out in droves for the man who promised change in 2008, and encouraging them to do the same in the less-glamorous midterms.
But his recent attempts to connect with the public have simply served to underscore the extent to which the shine has come off Mr Obama’s halo.
I hope that it's really true, that folks are seeing through this entire act, and won't be bamboozled again. Especially American women. As usual, I fall back on my customary thought experiment; what if a prominent conservative blatantly bypassed the traditional media outlets and made an appearance on a daytime show, fielding only softball questions, openly believeing that his charm and good looks alone could sway substantial numbers of female voters? Can you imaging the white hot OUTRAGE!?!? And when is the press corps going to finally get tired of being blown off by this guy, and get wise to the fact that he played them like useful idiots; the role Democrats have seen the press as fulfilling for years.
This episode not only reveals the low opinion that Democrats have for women, but the shameless pandering that's inherent to their identity politics; and in this instance all the panderer-in-chief is offering is his charisma! I only hope that few are swayed.
And I'll get down off my soapbox now, and let you tell me what you think.












