SEIU Terror, Latin American Anti-Semitism, CNN Lies About Bible Burning
Last week the F.B.I. targeted terror suspects in Illinois and Minnesota. In Illinois one of the suspects was a Wright College teacher and the other an SEIU leader.
Joseph Iosbaker is an SEIU Leader. The sheepish Chicago Media went weak in the knees when Mr. Iosbaker and SEIU used the closing of the Republic Windows factory several years ago as a forum for disgraced Governor Blagojevich. Now, Iosbake [sic] is being investigated in a terrorist plot.
The Chicago media is following the lead of what they are told and tasked. SEIU is disappearing from the news reports on Iosbaker and his wife Wright College instructor Stephanie Weiner. They may be linked to anti-Israeli and Columbian FARC terrorism and that is what the Federal Bureau of Investigation is . . .investigating.
Later in the post, this email received by the author is reproduced:
This is interesting. I teach on a part-time basis at Wright and the divide between the full-time and adjunct faculty is a wide one. As such, I do not know Weiner.
What I can attest to is that:
1. Bill Ayers has been invited to address the students within the past four years as an extracurricular exercise.
2. One of the handful of student groups on campus is "Students for Peace and Justice" which promotes LBQT issues, hatred of Israel and a homeland of Palestine.
3. In recent months, various maps posted on campus have been defaced by pro-Arab students. The state of Israel was scratched off of the maps.
The FBI doesn't anticipate any arrests at this time, but the operation is part of an investigation into material support of terrorism. Specifically, the allegations concern Latin American and Middle Eastern terror organizations.
It's nice to know that the FBI are making that connection. At Pajamas, Stefan Frank has a terrific piece about state-sponsored anti-Semitism in Venezuela. Venezuela is largely dependent on oil revenues and part of the OPEC cartel. It has cultivated relations with some of the most despicable Middle Eastern regimes, and as the article demonstrates, has become the supportive habitation of every kind of conspiracy theory crank. Recent intelligence suggests that Chavez, who can't keep the lights on, despite the oil revenues, and whose leadership is so effective that Caracas is now the most dangerous city in the world, beating out contenders like Karachi by a country mile, has been shopping around for fissionable material. Fidel Castro's recent bombshell rant against anti-Semitism must be understood to have been directed in part at his continental admirer, who has simply gone too far. The sabre rattling at Colombia is part and parcel of the usual fascist strategy, as is Chavez' transparent attempt to rig elections and cow the opposition by threat of violence.
In Brazil, a brave artist is speaking violence to power by representing himself murdering, among others, the Pope, George W. Bush, and the Queen of England. Not, apparently, among his targets of world malefactors whom he longs to bring to justice are any of the Middle Eastern monsters who continue to imprison, torture and wantonly slaughter their own. Naturally, burning of Korans is verboten, but excitable Muslims in Karachi found it fit to burn Bibles, musical instruments, and other religious texts at a Pentecostal church a day or two ago.
CNN:
The Quran teaches Muslims to respect the sacred books of Christians and Jews as well, says Chris van Gorder, a religion professor at Baylor University in Texas.
“To burn a holy Quran for a Muslim is to throw down a gauntlet,” he says. “Those who deface any holy book, including the Bible, in many Muslim countries today, will be executed.
“How many Bibles have been burned in the Muslim world in the last nine years? None.”
A Google search of Pakistan+Bible+burned shows that the good professor is misinformed. In fact, it brings up examples of Bible burning from quite a broad swath of Dar al-Salam. On the other hand, if you relied entirely on CNN for your news, you might find that believable.
I know that they weren't books, but I'm certain that the destroyers of the Bamyan Buddhas were harshly dealt with. You'll find this same variety of academic emotionally denounce the burning of Mayan codicils by 16th century monks.
But then again, some lies must be nurtured, because they are so instructive.
Related: Lefty activist apparently source of Boehner affair rumor
Who to punch first….
There's Taleb, who says true things that everyone already knows, but pretends he's a great seer. Also, the true things he tells you are absolutely useless (in terms of helping one see what actions are needed).
There's Gladwell, who spins a great just-so-story, and tells you stuff that would be useful, if said stuff were at all true.
Both make a lot of money in speaking fees and royalties.
The problem w/ Malcolm is 1: he doesn't know much about anything and 2: he's gullible. He never asks the questions that more educated people would ask. So Gladwell is extremely easy to attack. Steve Sailer is probably his most tenacious nemesis (and much better than most Gladwell critics when it comes to picking Malcolm apart on sports topics). My first real inkling of Gladwell's shallowness came when he wrote this misleading piece on pensions -- Jane Galt/Megan McArdle critiqued it (as did I here and here). Then I realized his modus operandi was pretty much the same across the board. Spin some kind of story around individuals, why "conventional thinking" was wrong, and swallow whatever story from advocate with some plausible-but-bullshit (usually irrelevant) explanation. Yes, it does take 10,000 hours or whatever to become tippy-top in whatever field but a: that's irrelevant to the vast majority of people out there (there are billions of us, you know - just being good at something is okay) and b: you can polish shit for 10,000 hours and it's nothing but a shiny ball of shit. Me practicing golf for 10K hours would not have made me into Tiger Woods. JEEZ.
Taleb has lots of critics, too, but he's harder to attack because his bullshit is less obvious. He usually tells a lot of truth. But why he's supposedly such a guru amongst everybody....not quite as compelling. He is usually taking stuff that's pretty well-known amongst the quants, and when it goes wrong in the way that quants know it can go wrong, he pops up and says "Told ya so!" in front of the non-numerate public. Booking Taleb can make your group seem smart in a way that booking Gladwell does not (because Gladwell obviously does not understand numbers in any real way.)
Anyway, I'll throw in Marilyn vos Savant as the third "public figure" who sticks in my craw, but she's not been in the public eye recently. Her stupidity was cemented for me when she decided her supposedly highest IQ made her competent to opine on math well beyond most mathematicians. She got a well-deserved drubbing amongst mathematicians (revenge for the Monty Hall problem screw-up, which she did get correct, but to be fair to the mathematicians, the problem was originally ill-posed), and slunk back to her brain-teasers, where she belonged.
Only if Taleb and Gladwell could slink back into obscurity, that would be great.
Yes, I'm feeling grumpy. I've got a few other nemeses, but those are my public ones. They don't even know I exist, which is fine by me.
Feminization and Taking Offense
This comes via The JamesonLewis3rd Daily, who got it from @allahpundit on Twitter:
Researchers analyzed the number of self-reported offences and apologies made by 66 subjects over a 12-day period. And yes, they confirmed women consistently apologized more times than men did. But they also found that women report more offenses than men. So the issue is not female over-apology. Instead, there may be a gender difference in what is considered offensive in the first place. The research appears in the September online issue of Psychological Science.
In a second study, three separate offences were rated by 120 subjects on a 7 point scale. And women consistently rated the three offences as more severe than men did. Turns out that men are just as likely as women to apologize for a given offense. But their threshold for thinking they have committed an offense is higher.
As a corollary it might be said that teaching people to be aggrieved is a form of feminization, to go with all the other forms of feminization that are at the core of the (public) educational mission these days.
Belated Post: Soros Funds J-Street [UPDATED]
No surprise, there. But what's interesting is that these religiously affiliated organizations that receive Soros funds seem reluctant to admit the connection, as was the case with Lyin' Jim Wallis and his SOjouRnOrS (yeah, I know that should be an "e") outfit and the Eleison Group.
Most monotheistic religions (and probably others) regard lying as a bad thing, so I suspect that they must have reasons for obfuscating their connections with Soros. I wonder what those might be. If you have any ideas, please express them in comments. Thanks.
Related: Article on lies told to students by teachers, and why they should or should not be corrected. A more pristine example of proggthink would be hard to come by. And the NYT's massively hyped hit piece on Boehner is a giant yawn.
Russ Feingold Running Behind, As Independent
Not on the ballot, mind you, but in commercials. Hot Air has the story.
In other words, Feingold is taking to heart the advice of Democracy Corpse, which amounts to dissimulate however you can! Clearly, Wisconsin isn't California, where the voters either were savvy enough to realize that the press' representation of Obama as a moderate was a ruse all along, or dumb enough to believe that the administration's policies are good, or cynical enough to believe that the only way Greece on the Pacific is going to be bailed out is if they keep their ninnies in power, because "empathy."
Feingold is stunned, of course. Two years ago, it seemed that the far left had won. He could not possibly have anticipated that today the star of Wisconsin's Congressional Delegation would be . . . Paul Ryan.
The problem, according to Long John Kerry, is that in the past two years voters have become stupidly susceptible to slogans that are not "Hope!" or "Change!" Obviously, it couldn't have anything to do with voters realizing that they've been lied to and bamboozled by those in power.
“The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars, but in ourselves if we are underlings.”
In case you missed yesterday's WI gubernatorial Q&A, Steve Egg drunkblogged it.
The Brutality of the Unvarnished Truth
The latest polling shows Barbara Boxer up 51% to 43% against Carly Fiorina, but that doesn't stop Chris Matthews from lamenting the tone of the Fiorina campaign, describing it as "brutal."
The brutality? Using a clip of Boxer insisting that she be addressed as "Senator," rather than "Ma'am." In other words, the brutality consists in showing Boxer as she is.
Brutal.
Politico: "The gay right is thriving at a moment that the mainstream gay rights movement faces a profound crisis." As I did, Stacy determined the lasting damage to Jesse Jackson, Jr. to arise from the fact that his imported paramour is a white woman with blond hair. One of Obama's problems with his gay supporters is that he has to be blacker than black to maintain the approval of his most stalwart constituency, and that means intolerance towards gays relative to to other racial designations. I'm sure that Progressives will point to the prevalence of Christian fundamentalism among black Americans, but I think that if anyone bothered to poll, they'd find less correlation than the Proggs would like.
Oh, and this Malik Shabazz is not the one who went to the White House just before the NBP case got dismissed. It was one of those other Malik Shabazznits. How do we know? That's what the White House says, wigger!
The most interesting aspect of Susie Madrak's contretemps with Axelrod was what it revealed about how one Proggie, at least, regards herself. Naturally, she's a victim. She and those who think like her are the ugly girl that the administration has sex with under the bleachers, but won't be seen with in the light of day. I won't go as far as Dan Riehl and say that what is implied is date rape, but it does then cast the Obama faction in the role of popular jock/frat boy who is willing to use someone who just wants to be loved---the kind of person who would punch a hippie for sport. Free love comes with strings attached, in other words.
The most interesting and important story of the week, though, was Christopher Coates' testimony before the Civil Rights Commission. Career lawyers with the DoJ were told not to bring any charges against non-whites for voting violations. Numerous states have flouted the law by deliberately refusing to scrub the voting rolls of dead persons. Robin Carnahan, running for Senator from MO, was held up as one of those who absolutely refused. I'll add, since I'm not aware that it came up in his testimony, that there are nine states that seem to find it inconvenient to present absentee ballots to military in time for them to vote.
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) member Steve Caddle of Houston, Texas has been caught registering 23,207 fake voters in Harris County alone due to the hard detective work of Catherine Engelbrecht and her “True the Vote” project.
I, for one, remember the leftist cant that persisted through the last election that vote fraud was a conservative fiction meant to undermine the validity of Democratic victories in tight elections. This time around, I'm not seeing it, but do let me know if you stumble upon any. Anybody like Steve Caddle ought to be thrown in jail for civil rights violations. We know that he's an SEIU member, but is he directly employed by the SEIU on leave from some other position, in order to pursue fraud full time? If so, that's an in-kind contribution, and must be reported as such.
Not that that sort of thing has anything at all to do with the administration's attempts to exempt unions from the same transparency standards as other institutions.
I have no idea why no one wants to listen to liberal talk radio
One of the 4 liberal talk radio hosts is a disgusting pig named Mike Malloy. About Dick Cheney's daughter, Liz, he said this yesterday:
I don't know why I give this psychopathic misdirected woman, you ought to be there planning your father's funeral, Liz, because I'm sure all the nation's bigwigs, especially the Republicans are going to fall all over themselves to worship in front of his coffin. That's what you ought to be doing instead of making your filthy, insane, gratuitous statements about what the American people expects their president or an administration to do to protect us from terrorist attack. Shame on you, Liz Cheney. Go plan your father's funeral. Just do that. Do at least one thing in your useless life that will have some meaning. Go plan his funeral.
Ageist. I can prove it.
According to progressive logic the only reason to oppose President Obama's policies is because you're a racist. Therefore, the only reason to oppose Dick Cheney's policies is because you don't like old people.
Just kidding, that kind of logic is unbelievably stupid, yet popular in some circles. Weird. The reality is that Mike Malloy isn't an ageist, just an oozing, syphilitic prick (h/tJimmie Bise). He's probably just jealous that no one has ever loved him enough to give a passing to his mortality. As a gesture of goodwill I'd like to publicly volunteer.
(H/T) @JohnnyA99
crossposted at KillTruck
Saturday Morning Links Dump, Featuring Moe Lane
Our favorite Evil Giraffe has the hilarious skinny on Democracy Corpse's recommendations to candidates, including run as an Independent and distance yourself from any Progg policies.
Deroy Murdock unpacks the DoJ's abettal of voter rolls swollen with zombies. Christopher Coates' testimony yesterday regarding Robin Carnahan's refusal to scrub the rolls was pretty devastating.
The always interesting Archbishop Chaput has words for prejudiced journalists, even as CNN prepares to air a hit piece on Benedict.
The H2 are going all out for Sean Bielat in his campaign against Barney Frank, and would like you to do so as well.
Plenty more news over at The JamesonLewis3rd Daily, which see.
An Vote In Support of Those Who Are Against People Against Masturbation
If Ya Think I'm Sexy
If I Think I Sexy
(Rod Stewart / Carmine Appice)
Sugar, sugar
I sit alone waiting for suggestions
I'm so nervous avoiding all my questions
My lips are dry, my heart is gently pounding
Don't I just know exactly what I'm thinking
If I want my body and I think I'm sexy
come on Enoch let me know.
If I really need me I'll reach out and touch me
come on Enoch tell me so
Tell me so Enoch!
I'm acting shy looking for an answer
Come on Enoch let's spend the night together
Now hold on a minute before I go much further
Give me a dime so I can phone my mother
I catch a cab to my high rise apartment
At last I can tell her exactly what my heart meant
If I want my body and I think I'm sexy
come on Enoch let me know.
If I really need me I'll reach out and touch me
come on Enoch tell me so
My heart's beating like a drum
'cos at last I've got myself home
Relax Enoch now I'm are alone
I wake at dawn 'cos all the birds are singing
Less than a stranger but that ain't what I'm thinking
Outside it's cold, misty and it's raining
I've got my Enoch neither me's complaining
I say's I'm sorry but I'm out of milk and coffee
Never mind Enoch we can watch the early movie
If I want my body and I think I'm sexy
come on Enoch let me know.
If I really need me I'll reach out and touch me
come on Enoch tell me so
Tell me so Enoch
If I really need me I'll reach out and touch me
come on Enoch let me know
If I really, really, really, really need me
I'll let me know
I'll reach out and touch me
If I really want me
I'll reach out and touch me
come on Enoch let me know
If I really need me I'll reach out and touch me
come on Enoch let me know
If I, if I, if I really need me
just come on and tell me so





