Prayers for Congresswoman Giffords
Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) was holding a town hall-type meeting when a gunman ran up and shot her and several aides, outside a Safeway store in Tucson. Some reports state that she was shot in the head.
BeefCake Weekend 2011Vol.1
Youtube refused to upload the video for hours...don't know why, but it's up now.
sooooooo here ya go!! :)
Note: This was supposed to be football players but SOMEBODY told me they would be too controversial and so you got Alex, thanks to my friend Connie.
Saturday Rule 5: Chase Masterson
One of the nice things about having Netflix on the Roku is that you run into movies that you've never heard of, such as "Yesterday Was a Lie." It's an ambitious dreamscape psychodrama film noir. Not a complete success, but neither a failure. It's full of allusions to Jungian archetypes, left-brain/right-brain dichotomy, linear versus non-linear time, Planck's Constant and yadda yadda. All of that would be irritatingly new agey and pseudo-scientific if it were pushed too far, but stands in instead for the intellect of a seeker who represses her emotions (the hard, chiaroscuro edge of the noir).
Dialogue here is okay. There are some awkward bits where the author/director seems to think he's really in synch with the clever, mordant patter of film noir at its best, and falls short. Cinematically, he does a good job of recreating the production values of the noir.
There are two attractive actresses at the center of all this. The one who plays a kind of Jungian anima-helper to the main character is Chase Masterson, of whom I was unaware, until I watched the movie.
Now, you probably know that blonde isn't really my thing, although I've elsewhere expressed my admiration for tiny Kristin Chenoweth (and her colleague on Pushing Daisies, Anna Friel). One thing Chenoweth and Masterson have in common: they can sing.
![]()
Lovely, in color or black and white. In fact, Ms. Masterson (birth name, Christianne Carafano, which is fine by me) was born in '63, which makes her a less ridiculous object of my admiration than if she were younger, I like to think. In a few of the scenes, because of the severe light, her skull seems almost pressing through her skin. I know that that will be a turn-off to a lot of youth-worshipping guys, and the sort of thing that most major actresses would nix, but for what it's worth, I find that has a sexiness of its own. YMMV.
The shots at IMDB reveal that Ms. Masterson isn't exactly waif-like, though perhaps they don't quite live up to the chubby chasing standard that Stacy holds me to. There's a little bit of Jenny McCarthy, recently mentioned here by Kill Truck, there, but mixed with Elizabeth Montgomery, which isn't a bad combo. There are pictures there, too, that make no effort to hide the horizontal wrinkles in the forehead. Rule of thumb, guys: the depth of horizontal lines to vertical (above the nose) on a woman of a certain age is a pretty good indication, along with crow's feet (good), of her character.
Reading further at IMDB, one finds out other things. She was born in Colorado Springs, Colorado, so possibly an Air Force brat. Also:
She has recently performed in USO tours for the Navy and the Marine Corps. Masterson has been actively involved in numerous charities worldwide, including Caring for Babies With AIDS, Homeboy Industries, Iris Ministries, and Youth With a Mission, and founded the G.E.N.I.U.S. charity umbrella organization which is supported by her licensed fan club. She donated proceeds from a 2008 American flag photo shoot to the organization Operation Call Home, supplying phone cards to U.S. troops.
So, there's that.

Here's looking at you, kid.
The Carnival of Fraud, 1-8-10 [UPDATE]
You probably know that I write some for Right Network. Among my friends and colleagues over there are Moe Lane and Christopher Taylor. Christopher's news round up is worth reading, and not just because it links to a couple of my posts.
One last underreported story? Usually the press loves Wikileaks, but there's one batch they sort of soft pedaled and ignored: the one that showed the invasion of Iraq was perfectly reasonable and proper. James Zumwalt at Human Events meticulously examines one portion of the leaks and the history of the Coalition of the Willing, showing how clearly the nuclear weapons program of Iraq was a threat and why it had to be acted on - and how Joe Wilson lied through his teeth.
When the leaks first arrived, I approvingly quoted Claire Berlinski saying in effect that the conspiracy theorists had been hardest hit. Whether the mixed effects of the revelations have had something to do with the partial leftist turn-about on Julian Assange is a question that's been rather drowned out by the Identity Feminist pushback. But as I like to say, people's motivations can be multiple, or complex, or even contradictory, if you like.
Here's hoping that David Thompson joins us there. Since Scott Burgess disappeared (to Slovakia, where he writes about mushrooms and cuisine), he's been the writer on point covering the idiocies of the Grauniad and other leftist UK publications.
I'm always saying that Richard Fernandez is my favorite writer at Pajamas. Here's a fragment from his latest:
Recently, the anti-vaccine movement received an impetus from a study by Dr. Andrew Wakefield, whose findings were published in the Lancet, showing that the mumps, measles and rubella vaccine caused autism. Unfortunately for Dr. Wakefield, his study has been attacked as a fraud. Many of his co-authors have retracted and it has been alleged that he received money from a group of lawyers to stir up liability suits against vaccine manufacturers.
[Emphasis mine] In medical malpractice and liability cases, physicians are held to a standard of responding appropriately to what they knew or should have known. It is time that lawyers were held to the same standards. After the Iraq War deaths fiasco, one might think that this blow to The Lancet would be enough to finish it, but one would be wrong, of course.
BP has been paying a law professor $950 per hour, with another $475 for his research assistant, to find that the "Czar" of their $20 billion claims fund is fully independent from their influence. Plaintiffs' lawyers are outraged--OUTRAGED that the Czar would use such tactics as to purchase expert testimony on his behalf.
Via The Anchoress on Twitter comes this distressing tale:
A man who was molested as a child by a Portland priest -- then secured a $900,000 settlement from the church -- has yet to see a penny more than seven years after the church paid out the money.
In a lawsuit filed this week in Multnomah County Circuit Court, the man alleges that attorneys who represented him in the case managed to claim $877,000 of the settlement, leaving him with no more than $23,000. Yet the man, identified only by his initials, G.B., hasn't seen a check for any amount.
According to the suit, G.B. has been living off $400 to $500 a month in Social Security disability payments. Little else has been disclosed about G.B., other than he's suffered a lifetime of damage because of the abuse, which occurred while he was a student at All Saints School in Northeast Portland by the Rev. Thomas Laughlin. Laughlin was kicked out of the priesthood in 1983 after being convicted of molesting boys.
Unfettered rapacity.
You can add to that my post from earlier this week, about the brief filed by a prosecutor stating that as many as half of the claims of clergy abuse that he'd been involved in researching over a significant period of time were fraudulent. The Church pays out to avoid scandal and attorneys' fees, even where the evidence doesn't warrant them doing so. The Pigford Settlements, the monies taken from Fannie and Freddie in bonuses, often by people such as Chicago mayoral front-runner Rahm Emanuel who held their positions as sinecures, Jamie Gorelick's disastrous policies and practices rewarded, the flouting of SEC regulations and corporate law involved in bailing out Chrysler and GM--all rife with fraud. The continued gaming of the CBO scores for ObamaCare, the list goes on and on.
UPDATE: CBO now says repealing ObamaCare would save $540 billion.
But we as a society have a very deep interest in seeing that the very basest, most selfish, least scrupulous and most mendacious among us are punished for bearing false witness, rather than rewarded. Nancy Pelosi's jaw-dropping defense of her tenure's being all about the deficit reduction is only the most recent massive insult to the brain we've received from these people.
I wish Issa and King all success. Regardless of party, we need to let these people know that play time is over.
For some reason, Paleo Pat feels it's necessary for him to renounce on behalf of his own political niche the violence and stupidity of the would-be bomber who has mailed several incendiary packages, including one to Janet Napolitano, complaining about the eyes open PSAs that Homeland Security have been pushing, including on the DC Metro, urging people to report suspicious activities. Personally, I don't have enough information to regard the bomber as some kind of libertarian. For all I know, he or she may be an anarchist. At any rate, there have been enough false flag operations that I'm unwilling to make any statement regarding this person's self-affiliation, if any.
That's not to say that I don't renounce the use of violence and abhor this idiot's behavior, and hope that he (or she) is caught, and soon, and punished to the maximum extent of the law. I do. It's just that I file this under those "word problems" that require more information to solve.
Are You Ready For Some Football?

It's Wild-Card Weekend in the NFL, and I know that I am! There will be some good games this weekend, a couple that are too close to call. Let's go to the schedule
Saturday, 4:30 pm Eastern on NBC
New Orleans Saints at Seattle Seahawks: Based on these team's performances this year, this game shouldn't even be close; the Saints should B-B-B-Blowout! the Seahawks (Sorry K.T.). Of course, there is the Any Given Sunday effect. Too bad for Seattle that it's Saturday... Pick: Saints
Saturday, 8:00 pm Eastern on NBC
New York Jets at Indianapolis Colts: This might be the closest game of this weekend. Rex Ryan may be one of a few other coaches than Bill Belichick who can put together a scheme on defense to beat the Colts. But, he has some, er, distractions off the field stemming from his personal life. Indy finished the season strong, but have a great deal of injuries to key players on both offense and defense; but heretofore #18 has been able to find a way to win. This game will turn on whether the Jets offense can put any points on the board, and keep the Colts linemen from killing Mark Sanchez, because you know the Colts are going to score. Pick: Colts
Sunday, 1 pm Eastern on CBS
Baltimore Ravens at Kansas City Chiefs: This game is very much like the one between the Jets and Colts. The Chiefs have a pretty darn good offense, and unless Baltimore can keep them off the field they will probably eventually wear down the Raven's defense--the affliction that plagued them towards the end of the regular season. Both teams should have their full complement on the sidelines. The Chiefs offensive success centers around their running game; they are nearly last in passing. But, unfortunately for them, the Ravens are 5th in the NFL against the run and the Chiefs are 14th, so while a very close matchup, the Ravens should be able to run all over Kansas City and stop their run; but if not, well, then there'll be no joy in Balmer on Sunday night. Pick: Ravens
Sunday, 4:30 pm Eastern on Fox
Green Bay Packers at Philadelphia Eagles: This game will be much closer than either team's fans will be comfortable with. As far as the Igglez go, well, there's Mike Vick, the Philly D, and their always creative coach Andy Reid. But no one in the city of Brutha-ly love should casually dismiss the Packers. For a team that the conventional wisdom has always hailed because of their offense, Green Bay has sustained themselves through a season where their feature back, among others, has been injured by quietly playing very solid defense. Look for the Pack's defense to do a heckuva job containing the Mercurial Vick and force him to win the game with his arm--as well as rack up a surprising number of running yards on a stout Philly defense that will be concerned more with Aaron Roger's phenomenal passing accuracy and quick release. Pick: Packers.
Well, there are my picks kind reader. And admittedly, my regular season sooth-saying left much to be desired. Oh, and full disclosure; I have season tickets to the Ravens, despite the fact that I live adjacent to New York City on Long Island, but truthfully can say that didn't color my assessment.
Tell me your thoughts on the match-ups and what the final results will be, and enjoy the games! :)
A post about a post about autism (which I’m sure you’re sick of hearing about)
The last couple days have been hard for me, at least on the internet. Another story about the notorious Wakefield study broke yesterday, and I tried to bite my tongue through tweets, posts and links that I knew weren't true. Or at least accurate or fair. A lot of it was coming from friends on the right, friends that have been so supportive of Lord of the Flies.
The vaccine debate just makes me really sad. It's not debated fairly by either side, and it's such a distraction. There is so much more to helping people with autism than talking in circles about vaccinations they've already gotten, and the eventual impact this will have on society as a whole if we don't find the source is all but ignored, especially on the right.
So I wrote a carefully worded post about it here as this week's contribution at Pundit League. As I went to click "publish" first thing this morning I saw my twitter timeline full of Red Eye tweets from last night. I like Gutfeld, but he's, at the very least, not telling the whole story on this. I don't know if he had measles as a kid or what, but he spreads misinformation... often in joke form and it really pisses me off.
I don't know if there is a link between vaccines and autism, but I do know that Jenny McCarthy and co. are not telling anyone to not vaccinate their children. I also know the vaccine link theories were never based solely on the controversial Wakefield study. It seems these things are hard to fit in 140 characters, so this is lost on twitter. So I've spent the morning trying to correct the record as much as I can. I've been pleasantly surprised with the response to my Pundit League post, and I've seen some friends try to correct their tweets. A few have paid me lip service, but haven't issued any corrections.
This is Generation Rescue's recommendations on vaccinating children. It's actually very sensible and exactly what I would do if I could turn back the clock. I would still vaccinate Jack, but I would delay some of the vaccinations a few months, and I would insist he get them one at a time. Especially the MMR vaccine. I would ask to have that divided into 3 shots. I also would make my own baby food and not put sippy cups in the microwave, among other things.
I wonder if the right is lumping the vaccine issue in with climate change and throwing the whole baby out with the hypodermic needle.
I've been asked what I think causes autism. I don't know. I'm not a science person. I have no choice but to defer to those who are. If I had to place a bet, I suspect this is what's happening:
I think some people have a congenital predisposition to whatever this is. I also think there is something in our environment, maybe something new that is acting as a trigger. Most likely their bodies can't filter the toxins in the vaccines as fast as other bodies can. It's probably the same reason Jack's system can't filter gluten or casein, a protein My hope is that in the near future we will be able to isolate the genetic component, be able to test for it, then the parents of children at risk more informed decisions from there.
Then the debate will probably change from vaccinations to aborting the problem way, but that's for another day.
crossposted at KillTruck
UPDATE: Melissa Clouthier (aka MelissaTweets) has weighed in. I wanted to ask her what she thought about this when it broke, but I knew she was on the road. She's much more knowledgeable about the science and explains it so much better than I did, and agrees that the persecution of parents has to stop.
Pelosi: The Dems lost the mid-term elections because of Boooooooooosh!

Respect my authoritah!
Which is crazy talk, even when measured using standards set by the woman who publicly claimed that the Democrats were going to "Drain the Swamp" in Washington, that "We have to pass the bill [Obamacare] to find out what's in it", that she presided over "The most ethical Congress-EVAR!; the same princess of pay-go palaver who most recently declared that the 110th and 11th Congresses "were all about deficit reduction"-even though the national debt increased by nearly 50% under her stewardship.
I mean, I don't know whether to call this a zenith, or a nadir for Madame Pelosi. But certainly, it's a new high in lows.
"We still would have lost the election because we had 9.5% unemployment. Let's take it where that came from. The policies of George W. Bush and the Republican support for his initiatives, tax cuts are for the wealth, recklessness by some," Minority Leader Pelosi told CNN.
Speaking of Envy
To follow up on Enoch's post from yesterday, let's consider a couple of different points of view. And I mean really different.
First, from Clinton crony Robert Reich, a bit of complaining about the demonization of public employee unions.
By the way, Mr. Reich, those "higher degrees" in education circles are bullshit. Wonder why so many diploma mills are giving masters in education? Because public school teachers get a bump up in salary by how many degrees they have. There's a reason that the lowest GRE scores, the lowest SAT scores are for education degrees. When you make salary based on credentials as opposed to actual knowledge and performance, you get a lot of phoney-baloney degrees.
Second, Obama's pity for the poor, departing Gibbs who had to make do on a less-than-200K salary as the President's mouthpiece.
That comment reminds me of when Sen. Lauch Faircloth (Republican, North Carolina) tried to claim that his family was on a middle class income at the low, low amount of $300K. In the 90s. Needless to say, this was the guy that John Edwards (Democrat, Two Americas) beat for Senate seat.... and Edwards definitely didn't have a piddly income of $300K at the time. [Edwards represented my family in a medical malpractice case, by the way.]
So back to the public unions. Don't like your public image? Realize you have a PR problem. Your =customers= are the public, and they are pissed off. Private companies have to deal with this crap all the time, and even if something is not actually their fault, they do realize they have to do something about the impression that it is. In general, it's recognized that whining about unfairness is not an effective PR move. It might have helped some of these public policy guys if they actually had a real job at some point, where they had to deal with this sort of situation. They need some diversity in their ranks.
Separately, if the cuts are getting to be too much, then quit. If you think the pay is too low, go somewhere else. This is the way it works in the private sector -- often we see people "underpaid" for their jobs... because the employer knows it can get away with it. Why? Because said employee has allowed themselves to get stuck in some way - won't move, won't try to get employment elsewhere, has golden handcuffs in terms of benefits, actually not worth more to other employers, won't develop skills further. The employee then has no leverage.
I was paid piddly as an adjunct, because I could be (lots of starving grad students/newly-minted PhDs out there trying to stay in academia), and I left that to go to the far-more-remunerated actuarial world. The transparency of our salary scales means that employers need to be explicitly competitive. When someone is off the scale, and doesn't move, we know there's a leverage issue. I've often told people that if it's obvious you're not willing to leave, the employer is going to take advantage of that.
Finally, quit trying to gin up class wars. The more you try to foment a class war against "the rich", because some guys in government who went to Yale are making less money than some guys who went to no-name schools and are CEOs of profit-making businesses, the more regular people make their own neighborly comparison.
Envy is almost always amongst those you can see directly. And the "middle class" can see the public employees. The public employees that our taxes get hiked more and more to cover their pay and benefits. Someone got piggy, and there is a price to pay for that.
Again, this does not hold for all government jobs in all places. But the biggest class-war-fomenters seem to be in areas where there indeed is a large gulf between the public "servants" and the people being served. Funny you these highly-degreed people didn't see the possibility of their rhetoric turning right back on them.
Happy Days are Here again! Unemployment down to 9.4%
According to the figures released by BLS this morning, as reported by the AP. But curiously, the non-farm payroll job increases fell far short of the conventional wisdom estimates by economists; especially following in the wake of yesterday's barn-burner metric released by ADP claiming that employers added 297,000 jobs in December, coming in at 103,000 on expectations of 160,000 while private payrolls increased by 113,000 on expectations of 178,000. Is it time to start repeating the phrase, mantra-like, "Obama's failed economic policies". yet?
So if less jobs were created than expected, why did unemployment go down? Because the level of workforce particpation has dropped to a 25 year low. Once unemployed people give up looking for work, the government stops counting them as part of the U-3 unemployment number. In fact, the U-6 underemployment number, which more accurately measures total unemployment, is edging closer to it high in July 2010, currently stranding at 16.6% up 0.3% from November. And some folks believe that number may be understated as well, since a great many self-employed folks who are effectively unemployed are not necessarily included in that figure. I wonder where all the agitators decrying the "jobless recovery" have gone?
While some unemployed finally getting jobs is always good news, the average worker is still getting less than 40 hours a week, and these figures are subject to later revision, as always. So we won't really know the actual numbers until February 4th, when the January report comes in. If you have a job, or are self employed, count your blessings, and in any case, pray for those who need work but are unable to find any.
Sylvester McMonkey McBean’s Time Machine
Steamy!!!!!!!!!!! Mmmmmmmmmm. Mmmmmmmmmmmmm Mmmmmmmmmm.
That is all.
Carry on.





