Mary Katharine Ham’s Breasts

17Mar/1117

Mary Katharine Ham’s Breasts

It's entirely your right to scour the internet for photos of Mary Katharine Ham's breasts, but I just want to say that this isn't that sort of blog. Mostly.

I don't believe that there exists anywhere on the Internet a photo of Mary Katharine Ham's breasts. Nor do I think you are likely to find Liz Stephans' boobs or S.E. Cupp's tits or naked Hannah Giles or Dana Loesch nude.

If you take up a charity collection and ask them nicely, there's a very slender chance they might make such a thing available, but just looking at the searches that bring people here, I think it's a shame that so many man-hours are being wasted in search of a figment of a figment. So, please, stop visiting here looking for them.

Thank you.

The Management

Al Jolson sings "Yes we have no bananas" by jonff

UPDATE: 11:47am [Saint Louis, MO, USA] 99.100.198.50 1 action 10s google.com dana loesch breasts

2:33pm [Toronto, Canada] 99.233.116.251 1 action 10s google.ca St.Patricks nude boobs

3:33pm [Saint Louis, MO, USA] 99.20.96.181 1 action 10s google.com dana loesch tits

2:25am [Toronto, Canada] 141.117.185.228 1 action 10s google.ca mary katharine ham sexy pics

12:27pm [Springtown, TX, USA] 75.222.21.213 1 action 10s google.com se cupp tits

2:07pm [Doaktown, Canada] 174.35.252.129 1 action 10s google.ca mary katharine ham nudes

3:57pm [Red Bud, IL, USA] 216.158.119.118 1 action 10s google.com dana loesch nude

6:33pm [College Park, MD, USA] 173.166.148.193 1 action 10s google.com dana loesch boobs

12:55pm [Seattle, WA, USA] 24.19.3.18 2 actions 1m 5s google.com mary katherine ham breasts

12:06am [Newcastle, CA, USA] 64.55.111.6 1 action 2m google.com mary katharine ham SEXY PICTURES

UPDATEx2: Stacy links and offers to take responsibility, but I decline, being fully capable of creating a debacle on my own. Boobaquiddick. Geez.

Dan Collins

Dan Collins is a dude who blogs. He used to blog elsewhere. Now he blogs here.

More Posts - Website

Filed under: Too Lazy to Categorize Leave a comment

Comments (17) Trackbacks (2) ( subscribe to comments on this post )

Jerry Wilson / Goldfish and Clowns
March 17th, 2011 - 10:59

There are no words.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
snaqwells
March 17th, 2011 - 11:06

I’d call you a whore, but that might just drive more traffic.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
jefferson101
March 17th, 2011 - 11:18

Hey, Dan:

Will you please stop exposing all of my Google search terms?

I wondered why I kept winding up here!

/sarcasm

On the serious side, there are days when I’m not sure about this whole internet thing. One hopes that the slimy electrons don’t get recycled, because I’d hate to be exposed to the ones that a lot of folks seem to be using.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
- Dan Collins
  March 17th, 2011 - 11:28
  
  Yes. Even if I had a photo like that, I wouldn’t post it, because that would be exploitative.
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )
  - Jill Elswick
    March 17th, 2011 - 11:54
    
    So we’re safe if we send you pix of our boobs?
    
    Like or Dislike: 0 0
    ( REPLY )
    - Jill Elswick
      March 17th, 2011 - 11:57
      
      Hey, I don’t like my avatar on this site. It was supposed to be a photo of my boobs. Trying to figure out how to change it.
      
      Like or Dislike: 0 0
    - Dan Collins
      March 17th, 2011 - 12:01
      
      Certainly. But more importantly, I can act as arbiter when those creepy people try to process your photos through this.
      
      Like or Dislike: 0 0
    - Jill Elswick
      March 17th, 2011 - 12:19
      
      Completely weird . . . ugh.
      
      Like or Dislike: 0 0
jefferson101
March 17th, 2011 - 12:07

Jill:

It’s sweet of you to think of us and all that, but we’ve all already seen all the pictures of Obama and Biden that we really care to.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
- Jill Elswick
  March 17th, 2011 - 12:13
  
  Ha ha! Good one.
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )
  - jefferson101
    March 17th, 2011 - 12:18
    
    Thanks. I’ll be here until 17:30.
    
    (Yes. I am having a slow day at work today.)
    
    Like or Dislike: 0 0
    ( REPLY )
Jill Elswick
March 17th, 2011 - 12:47

It is very odd to see in my inbox that there was a “new comment on Mary Katharine Ham’s breasts” . . . I feel like we are writing on her with a Sharpie. I am going to stop now.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
- Dan Collins
  March 17th, 2011 - 16:39
  
  Probably a good idea. Seems Stacy tweeted her about this post and she’s not amused. I may pull it down. I’m certainly not going to make it sticky.
  
  Like or Dislike: 0 0
  ( REPLY )
  - Robert Stacy McCain
    March 17th, 2011 - 17:08
    
    Dan: You can un-publish. Update and explain, but I think unpublishing a Rule-5-Gone-Awry is, at some level, counterproductive.
    
    Plead insanity. A diagnosis of Blogger Mood Disorder is a cinch.
    
    Like or Dislike: 0 0
    ( REPLY )
    - Dan Collins
      March 17th, 2011 - 17:17
      
      Couldn’t I just plead insensitivity? Thanks for the link, BTW.
      
      I meant to use the post to name and shame all the searchers (by ISP, anyway) who come here looking for that. Nude Morena Baccarin, on the other hand, is okay to link, I think, because she did a movie nude scene.
      
      Or am I wrong?
      
      Like or Dislike: 0 0
Free Pioneer
March 17th, 2011 - 16:35

Some of us are dreamers

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )
jefferson101
March 17th, 2011 - 17:26

I don’t see how anyone could read the post and come away with any other impression than that you were pointing at the slimeballs and saying “Shame!” It was really obvious to me, anyway, and I’m reputed to be sort of dense some days.

Eddings had Mandorallen state: “It matters not what anyone else thinks my motives are, as long as I know they are pure.” That’s a paraphrase, because I’m at work and don’t have access to the book, but I think the sentiment is about right for this event.

Like or Dislike: 0 0
( REPLY )