Slated to replace “Bob’s your uncle.”
Stacy McCain, drawing on his vast knowledge of human nature, has for some time now had the top Google ranking for “Kate Middleton upskirt photos.” Britons (by rights, I think, since they underwrite it) naturally are interested in the environs visited by the Royal Penises, and relieved, I suppose, after long consideration of Camilla Bowles, that the body attached to the (now) Royal Vagina of their new Princess is comely.
While I haven’t any upskirt photos, I do have evidence that Kate Middleton has nipples, or at any rate a nipple (though the other one seem implied):
If you don’t care for that, you’re a very epicure. The fellow on the left seems keenly aware that he has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to scope things out through a very slender layer of fabric. I imagine that gives one as much an idea of the Newly Royalized Vagina as any upskirt photo might. I hope I can say without any prurience that it appears to me from the evidence available that it is not likely mutant in any important respect. Another British Kate who fills out a bathing suit rather better, IMO, is Kate Upton, which is what you get by mashing together Kate Middleton and upskirt.
But since we bloggers are very much celebrities in our own right, I’m certain that a large number of you have wondered what my wife looks like, naked. I am given to understand that it would be bad form actually to post a photo of my naked wife, but this ought to give you a pretty good idea. Note that I am merely stating that this is quite similar, the important thing being that it’s not identical (NSFW):
UPDATE: So far, interest in Kate Middleton’s nipples has emanated from Katmandu, Karachi, Brazil, Italy (naturally), France, Switzerland, Denmark, Australia, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Ireland, Austria, Spain, and a variety of other countries, suggesting (though not proving) that fascination with Royal Nipples is trans-cultural.
Welcome, Athens, Kuala Lumpur, Dusseldorf, Taipei.