Disintegration
Pop would often say (when I was a young Root), "These things that we know beyond what is inherently known to us imbued by the Creator - the knowledge passed from one generation to the next is a treasure - the cumulative wisdom of the lives of those who came before us". Or some such. His argument was that only a fool would rely on his own experiential knowledge. He would lament the concept of a "self-made man" - to him this fiction was the height of arrogance and pride. So, a man who would say such a thing, in Pop's estimation, was a self-made fool. But he was (and is) olde school that way.
As I have grown older and older still, I have come to appreciate Pop's opinion on the matter more and more.
I am saddened by what I see, of course. Not unlike many of my fellow countrymen, I too fear that there are great swaths of people among us (all infused with the knowledge of good and evil in their hearts) who have no treasure from which to draw, no compass to refer to, no default script on which to depend in these most interesting times. These individuals born as dignified creatures, God's most prized creation among all of His Creation... these Human Beings intended to achieve beyond the Angelic Choirs... have been betrayed. It is true. But they have not been betrayed by "Society" - they have been betrayed by their very own predecessors. And while Society may have a level of obligation toward these, the least among us, it is fair to discuss why a man's unfulfilled obligations to his children is so very morally reprehensible.
One need only read the stories about abandoned babies, children living in condemned homes of filth, children being beaten to death, infants being shaken and smothered, and the wholesale abuse of children in every conceivable manner to realize that there is something more than financial need in the world. This is to say that money is a salve for pocketbooks. What does it do, really, to alleviate a Human condition so destitute and laid bare that none can make an actual account of the deficit? Even a dumb animal needs for food. We are more than animals. It is fair to use the term "Morally Bankrupt", but it begs the question: how can one be bankrupt when one inherited no estate to begin with?
This is neither the first or the last generation to lament its inability to reconcile what it sees with its own eyes to the romance of bygone days and the real expectations it is seeing dashed upon the rocks day-by-day. I am old enough to remember a very different country. And I am still young.
Our family lives in the burbs. Most local atrocities still occur 25 or so minutes away. Nevertheless, the Cancer is spreading. And by that I am not speaking in code. I am not even talking about inner-city, Black Human People moving out in this direction. Nope. I am talking about the truly disenfranchised. The fatherless children. The children being raised in broken homes. The children being raised by another mom or dad... or no mom or dad, or moms and dads that really don't have time for them. In what manner can a father pass along the wisdom that is the child's rightful inheritance if he is not there to do it? Or will not do it? Or is not permitted to do it? Perhaps worse; how is a man who was not entrusted with an inheritance to begin with supposed to pass along what he does not himself possess?
I fear we really have entered into a phase of the American Story from which we cannot recover. Father is a caricature. Mother is a MILF. Daughter is raw material for future issues of Playboy and Penthouse, and son is raw material for someone else's pension. Husband is a relative term and wife is diminished.
I am not suggesting that any reasonable Person is innocent due to circumstance. Not at all. What I am suggesting is that perhaps there is something to the tried and true approach to living. I know I may sound backward-looking, but Father, Mother, Sons, Daughters - a so-called "Traditional Family" means a hell of a lot more than Daddy and Mommy having sex without people getting all judgey about it. I know it's not exotic... it's not "progressive"... it is sort of melba toast in the eyes of Those Who Know Better... but really maybe, just maybe there's something to it.
Even so, so much is lost already. For Age and a Day, commentators have longed that this library hadn't burned... that this painting had not been destroyed... have trembled in fear that this work or that work seems lost forever. And it is reasonable to cry over these things. No?





June 16th, 2011 - 08:34
Thank the feminists and their creation of divorce 2.0 where fathers never get custody of their children. The fathers can be falsely accused of domestic violence, rape and child abuse without any proof and be found guilty.
The mother is awarded custody, child support and alimony in the divorce. If the father then loses his job in this economy, he faces jail time which can make him permanantly unemployable.
Where are the fathers? Driven off by the mothers.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
June 16th, 2011 - 20:44
Men and women are both contributing to the breakdown of the family. The problem is that as a society we don’t take marriage or the consequences of its failure seriously.
Like or Dislike:
1
2
June 16th, 2011 - 09:17
I remember reading an article years ago about the up and coming generation lacking a moral compass and with their being raised in such conditions of squalor and neglect and that they would never, due to lacking the proper tools, propel society forward into a greater day
when they ascended the helm. The article was written in the 1600′s.
True..we cannot go back to the one that wrote that article and show him
what we have achieved in the interim. Who knows maybe his response would be…Told Ya So!
Like or Dislike:
1
0
June 20th, 2011 - 17:09
I’ve also read many of those jeremiads about the upcoming generation. The interesting thing is that most of them were written by countries on the decline; so, in general, they’re right.
Just because the torch of progress can be passed to another country, doesn’t make it easier for the country that was holding the torch beforehand.
Ask an older Englishman about how well England managed its decline from 1945 to 1970.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
June 16th, 2011 - 19:19
Father’s are now only superfluous, expendable second parents. At a whim they can be kick out of their own houses and reduced to just a paycheck. The courts will strip you of everything you own but the last thing they’ll do is enforce visitation rights. A family is now a woman and her children. They head of the family is the government and a man is a resource to exploit.
The whole marriage and kids thing is a mess. A man must either be naive or a fool to volunteer for it.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
June 16th, 2011 - 20:18
“The whole marriage and kids thing is a mess. A man must either be naive or a fool to volunteer for it.”
Well, either he is going to be those, or he’s going to be paying enough attention to the woman that he is marrying to figure out if she’s worth marrying or not.
Be it noted. I don’t deny the fact that there are a fair number of men out there who have been messed around badly by the system. My estimate would be 40%, plus or minus a couple of percentage points.
The other 60% or so brought it on themselves by being lazy and self-centered azzholes who couldn’t wash a dish or change a diaper if their lives depended on it. (And that’s not because they are working 70 hours a week, either. It’s because they are basically useless.)
I don’t approve of the way things are currently done as far as child custody and support awards are handled. But I will note that in at least 60% of the divorces I’ve personally seen happen to folks I know, I would not have given the father custody if my life depended on it.
Mama wasn’t necessarily any great shakes either, but I know way too many totally useless guys, particularly among my kids’ generation. There are a lot of them who I wouldn’t trust with a dog or cat, let alone a child.
Be that as it may, however, my initial point still applies. If one takes their time about getting married, and gives more points to character than to physical beauty, one can perhaps still make it work.
Hey. I’ve managed to get my Lady to keep me for 38 years and change now, and I am hardly the ideal husband. ;-)
I could offer that she hasn’t been the ideal wife at times, either. But we are the ones we picked, and I knew her well enough to believe that she was the same way I am. “Until death do us part” means exactly that. We have both probably contemplated murder a time or two, but we don’t do divorce.
And we are hanging in there. So far, anyway. I’m worried about what is going to happen when I finally retire, but that’s a good while down the road yet. We’ll burn those bridges when we get to them.
Like or Dislike:
1
1
June 16th, 2011 - 20:45
Yup.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
June 16th, 2011 - 20:45
Excellent post.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
June 16th, 2011 - 22:24
thx KT
Like or Dislike:
0
0