Announcing the Cookies Series – a Conservative Tutorial for Liberals
I am forming in my mind a series of posts relating to conveying the rightness of Conservative logic to Liberals in a manner in which Liberals can digest.
I am reminded that we must appeal to our audience in a manner which is pithy, simple, and direct.
In this series of posts I intend to explore the following:
1) the concepts of "fairness" and "charity" and "Charity"
2) the concepts of "equality" and "equity"
4) the difference between "liberty" and "license"
5) the difference between a "right" and a "privilege"
6) "prudence" vs "principle"
7) objective discernment of "right" vs "wrong"
8) crimes of "commission" vs crimes of "omission"
9) inherent dignity
10) probability
11) history
12) language
13) "truth" vs "Truth"
14) "skepticism" vs "cynicism"
this could take a while. suggested topics welcome.
Steve Jobs Warned Obama of a One-Term Presidency
With Steve Job’s biography hitting the bookshelves, salacious excerpts have begun to be leaked to the press; including a revelation that the late Apple CEO once told U.S. President Barack Obama he was “headed for a one-term presidency.”

Walter Isaacson’s authorized account of Jobs’ life goes on sale Oct. 24. The book is based on more than 40 interviews with Jobs and over 100 additional discussions with family members, friends, adversaries, competitors and colleagues. Isaacson chronicles “the roller coaster life and searingly intense personality of a creative entrepreneur whose passion for perfection and ferocious drive revolutionized six industries: personal computers, animated movies, music, phones, tablet computing and digital publishing,” according to a Simon & Schuster summary of the book.
Jobs: “You’re heading for a one-term presidency.”
According to the Huffington Post, Jobs’ warning to Obama came during a meeting in San Francisco that Jobs took five days to agree to attend. He told Obama the U.S. wasn’t business-friendly enough, citing over-regulation and unnecessary costs. Jobs also said the U.S. education system was “crippled by union work rules” and school principals should be allowed to hire and fire teachers based on merit. Schools should also stay open until 6 p.m. and be in session 11 months of the year, an extensive blog post stated.
Isaacson also relates that Jobs was not very impressed with Obama and said the president’s focus on the reasons things can’t get done infuriated him. Despite this seemingly fractious relationship, Jobs offered to help create Obama’s 2012 political campaign ads.
Jobs on Bill Gates
The book excerpts published by the Huffington Post also indicate Bill Gates was fascinated by Jobs but found him “flawed as a human being” as he was “either in the mode of saying you were shit or trying to seduce you.”
Jobs was equally caustic in relation to Gates, saying: “Bill is basically unimaginative and has never invented anything, which is why I think he’s more comfortable in philanthropy than technology. He just shamelessly ripped off other people’s ideas,” the Huffington Post article stated.
Jobs on Dying
Jobs’ recent death was attributed to a rare form of pancreatic cancer that ravaged the Apple CEO’s body. After an initial diagnosis, Jobs waited nine months before surgery because he felt homeopathic remedies would cure him. Isaacson touches on the late days of Jobs’ life and regrets he had regarding the illness.
In a 60 Minutes interview, Isaacson said he thought Jobs felt if something was ignored it would go away with “magical thinking.” Of Jobs’ pending death, Isaacson said, “He wanted to talk about it, how he regretted it… I think he felt he should have been operated on sooner.”
Entendre Raison
Written By: Dr. Dan P. Collins, Sr
This past year I have been pondering the age old question, "why do bad things happen to good people?". All who have seriously studied have reasoned the answer is to be found in the "spiritus" (spiritual) aspect of man ("the soul") rather than the profain ("material") aspect. A course on the Sapiential Books of the Bible (ie. Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon...) given by Father Joseph Korterski, S.J., of Georgetown was informative and all pointed to the love and fear of God as the beginning of wisdom. Fear in not the fear of a slave, but an acknowledgement of the enormous discrepancy between God's omnipotence and our total dependency. Wisdom "resplendent" comes with "solicitude" to Job: God has reasons but has no responsibility to explain himself.
In my quest, probably as a result of my limitations, two sources provide greater satisfaction. One is a poem I will attach. The other four words from a Third Century theologian. Irenaeus's concept of the redemptive tutelage of suffering. Meditating on suffering as a tutor or a teacher that promotes redemption brings insight.
Suffering requires an increase in faith and hope; promotes virtues of Patience, Perseverance, Humility and above all Love... "The fulfillment of the Law." Seen in this dimension suffering is the reason itself.
The poem "The Silversmith" makes this point in a more artistic way.
[poem to be inserted here]
Everything Must be Free!
Evidently, that's the "common cause" of the Occupy Whatever movement right now.
(By the way, I was warned yesterday of an Occupy Hartford "event" that was occurring around about rush hour, and I was concerned I was going to have an issue getting out of work. I needn't have been worried. The pathetic gathering could barely fill up one block, on one side of the street, on one city sidewalk. There was a smattering of UAW signs, but evidently the bus to bring them to CT's capital must've been very small. Or people had better things to do.)
So I see this bitchery in the NYT:
WHEN Bank of America told its customers recently that it would start charging them $5 a month to use debit cards, it argued that it was forced to make that change because of regulations that altered the economics of the cards. Other banks agreed. The chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, Jamie Dimon, put the effects of the regulations this way: “If you’re a restaurant and you can’t charge for the soda, you’re going to charge more for the burger.” Both banks were responding to the Federal Reserve’s actions to limit the interchange fees banks charge stores each time a debit card is used for a purchase.
But the banks’ simplistic statements are merely an attempt to rationalize and obfuscate one of the largest illegal transfers of wealth from consumers to banks in American history.
No, it's not illegal, dumbass. You don't like debit card charges? Fine. Don't use a debit card, then. No one is forcing you to. No one is forcing you to have a bank account, even. Heck, some of the toniest places in NYC accept cash only, no debit cards, credit cards, checks, or money orders.
I've used a debit card in the past 20 years a sum total of: once. And the only reason I had used the debit card was because it had a smaller use fee than a credit card for the particular transaction I wanted to make (it was paying quarterly estimated federal income taxes, if you want to know). I had a choice. I made it.
Interestingly, after that "illegal" start to his op-ed, the author ends it with this:
Retail customers of Bank of America and of any other bank that follows its lead should swiftly move their business. I am certain that other banks will welcome the competitive opportunity that Bank of America has given them with its arrogant and disingenuous action and justification.
Exactly. People can move their business elsewhere. Nothing illegal is going on, and both retailers and customers can decide what they want to do.
I remember this sort of blather over ATM fees a while back. Funny how I don't hear about that any more, though ATMs definitely still charge fees. The main difference is that I'm explicitly told the fee before I complete the transaction, and I decide if I want to continue. Well, there's no hidden fees here, either, so you make a decision whether you want to be hit with it or not.
OWS: Free the bathrooms!
Panini and Company Cafe normally sells sandwiches to tourists in Lower Manhattan and the residents nearby, but in recent days its owner, Stacey Tzortzatos, has also become something of a restroom monitor. Protesters from Occupy Wall Street, who are encamped in a nearby park, have been tromping in by the scores, and not because they are hungry.
Ms. Tzortzatos’s tolerance for the newcomers finally vanished when the sink was broken and fell to the floor. She installed a $200 lock on the bathroom to thwart nonpaying customers, angering the protesters.
“I’m looked at as the enemy of the people,” she said.




