Entendre Raison
Written By: Dr. Dan P. Collins, Sr
This past year I have been pondering the age old question, "why do bad things happen to good people?". All who have seriously studied have reasoned the answer is to be found in the "spiritus" (spiritual) aspect of man ("the soul") rather than the profain ("material") aspect. A course on the Sapiential Books of the Bible (ie. Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon...) given by Father Joseph Korterski, S.J., of Georgetown was informative and all pointed to the love and fear of God as the beginning of wisdom. Fear in not the fear of a slave, but an acknowledgement of the enormous discrepancy between God's omnipotence and our total dependency. Wisdom "resplendent" comes with "solicitude" to Job: God has reasons but has no responsibility to explain himself.
In my quest, probably as a result of my limitations, two sources provide greater satisfaction. One is a poem I will attach. The other four words from a Third Century theologian. Irenaeus's concept of the redemptive tutelage of suffering. Meditating on suffering as a tutor or a teacher that promotes redemption brings insight.
Suffering requires an increase in faith and hope; promotes virtues of Patience, Perseverance, Humility and above all Love... "The fulfillment of the Law." Seen in this dimension suffering is the reason itself.
The poem "The Silversmith" makes this point in a more artistic way.
[poem to be inserted here]
Everything Must be Free!
Evidently, that's the "common cause" of the Occupy Whatever movement right now.
(By the way, I was warned yesterday of an Occupy Hartford "event" that was occurring around about rush hour, and I was concerned I was going to have an issue getting out of work. I needn't have been worried. The pathetic gathering could barely fill up one block, on one side of the street, on one city sidewalk. There was a smattering of UAW signs, but evidently the bus to bring them to CT's capital must've been very small. Or people had better things to do.)
So I see this bitchery in the NYT:
WHEN Bank of America told its customers recently that it would start charging them $5 a month to use debit cards, it argued that it was forced to make that change because of regulations that altered the economics of the cards. Other banks agreed. The chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, Jamie Dimon, put the effects of the regulations this way: “If you’re a restaurant and you can’t charge for the soda, you’re going to charge more for the burger.” Both banks were responding to the Federal Reserve’s actions to limit the interchange fees banks charge stores each time a debit card is used for a purchase.
But the banks’ simplistic statements are merely an attempt to rationalize and obfuscate one of the largest illegal transfers of wealth from consumers to banks in American history.
No, it's not illegal, dumbass. You don't like debit card charges? Fine. Don't use a debit card, then. No one is forcing you to. No one is forcing you to have a bank account, even. Heck, some of the toniest places in NYC accept cash only, no debit cards, credit cards, checks, or money orders.
I've used a debit card in the past 20 years a sum total of: once. And the only reason I had used the debit card was because it had a smaller use fee than a credit card for the particular transaction I wanted to make (it was paying quarterly estimated federal income taxes, if you want to know). I had a choice. I made it.
Interestingly, after that "illegal" start to his op-ed, the author ends it with this:
Retail customers of Bank of America and of any other bank that follows its lead should swiftly move their business. I am certain that other banks will welcome the competitive opportunity that Bank of America has given them with its arrogant and disingenuous action and justification.
Exactly. People can move their business elsewhere. Nothing illegal is going on, and both retailers and customers can decide what they want to do.
I remember this sort of blather over ATM fees a while back. Funny how I don't hear about that any more, though ATMs definitely still charge fees. The main difference is that I'm explicitly told the fee before I complete the transaction, and I decide if I want to continue. Well, there's no hidden fees here, either, so you make a decision whether you want to be hit with it or not.
OWS: Free the bathrooms!
Panini and Company Cafe normally sells sandwiches to tourists in Lower Manhattan and the residents nearby, but in recent days its owner, Stacey Tzortzatos, has also become something of a restroom monitor. Protesters from Occupy Wall Street, who are encamped in a nearby park, have been tromping in by the scores, and not because they are hungry.
Ms. Tzortzatos’s tolerance for the newcomers finally vanished when the sink was broken and fell to the floor. She installed a $200 lock on the bathroom to thwart nonpaying customers, angering the protesters.
“I’m looked at as the enemy of the people,” she said.
In WEA We Don’t Trust
In the wake of the passage of Governor Scott Walker's Public Union Employee curtailing of collective bargaining privileges, the citizens of Wisconsin have begun to learn to what extent they have been scammed year-over-year. No where is this more apparent than in regard to the School Teachers' Union insurance concern WEA Trust (Wisconsin Education Association Trust).
In district after district, Cheeseheads are learning that not only have they been gouged but gouged mightily in this unholy alliance of Big Labor and Monopolistic business arrangements, but that the abuses are being revealed to be more significant than was touted by the Walker Administration and state legislators.
How we know this is the case is that for those districts that refused to extend Public School Teacher Union contracts before Walker's reforms became law, budget surpluses are now being realized. For those school districts that extended Union contracts before the new laws went into effect budget shortfalls. As a result, in those districts with new-found surpluses, property tax levies have either remained flat or been reduced. Of course, the opposite is true for those unfortunates living in districts whose boards shamefully chose the Unions over the taxpayers on behalf of whom we have been reminded they are to serve (ie. Milwaukee Public Schools district).
The extent of the grift perpetrated under the Democrats at the state level and their allies in the Teachers' Union is stunning.
To say nothing about overpaying, double-dipping (whereby a teacher retires and is rehired the next day and subsequently receives full pension, full benefits, and full salary all on the taxpayers' pocketbook), mandated cost of living adjustments, tenure (or the inability to weed out the awful teachers), the worst scam of all appears in the form of WEA Trust.
For years upon years, the Wisconsin Teachers Union has baked in a mandate for a good many districts to purchase Cadillac insurance plans from... wait for it... the Wisconsin Teachers Union. Being over-insured is one thing. Over-paying to over-insure teachers is another thing.
Yesterday, it was revealed that one district in Wisconsin (Oshkosh)
...could save about $774,000 this year and another $1.3 million next year by leaving its union-affiliated health insurance for a new provider".
The district requested proposals from providers in July after its labor unions gave the board full control over health insurance as part of a one-year collective bargaining agreement.
... Business director Bob Tess said[,]"We weren't just looking for the cheapest plan. It just so happens that the best plan was also the least expensive."
Read the whole thing Here
Makes one wonder aloud who will benefit most from Obamacare.
Man Who Begged Obama at LinkedIn Forum Positively Identified
The Blaze's Meredith Jessup also discovered the story behind this piece of guerrilla theater:
Turns out that Robert, who describes himself as a Bolivian Marxist, is indeed a student at Georgetown Law, and does have parents. After that, though:
According to the Daily Kos, Robert should be commended as “a patriot” for spelling out the reason people are protesting. “If you can watch it without being affected, you are as heartless as Dick Cheney,” the site notes.
There’s just one problem: Robert Stephens’ story is (surprise!) completely bogus.
Phone inquiries into the county property records & taxpayer services office reveal that the Stephens family home is not and never has been in foreclosure, that property taxes had been paid in full this year and the remaining balance on their mortgage for the half-million dollar home is less than one year’s worth of tuition+fees at their son’s law school.
The nail in this empty protest‘s coffin is a delightful phone conversation I just had with Robert’s mother, Marquita, where she admitted Chase Bank indeed was not “taking” their home from them. Instead, due to a recent “reduction in income,” they’ve decided to hold a “short sale.”
When I asked Mrs. Stephens if she and her husband planned to stay in their suburban St. Paul, Minn., surroundings after the sale, she told me they weren’t too keen on the idea. The area is “a bit too conservative,” she said.
Much more fun at Conservative Commune, where I also have up a bleg that so far has netted me $5, in case any of you remembers me. I've been en fuego on Solyndra/LightSquared there, if I do say so myself. So . . . in your orisons.
I'm going to reboot this blog, too, as I'll have time on my hands after work in Wisconsin, as soon as I can get out there. Hope to see you around.
Cripples and Bedroom Slippers… and the Vanishing G
Can't imagine a Conservative or White Person ever getting away with such things... but then, he slices, dices, and walks on water.

This Is Culture. Bow Down.
No, this is not a political post.
Okay, just one political bit:

[Lee Greenwood]GOD BLESS THE USA![/Lee Greenwood]
So some pretty complete coverage here: Part 1, Part 2
A few choice costumes:

Miss Ireland has no time for Riverdance

Miss Chile got stuck in a hole for months, and all she got was this crummy costume

Miss Costa Rica is ready for the human sacrifice

Miss Japan has got some kickass platforms. And swords.
That Man Said Bad Words at Me
It seems Mr. Mayor of Chicago told off a union rep:
Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis says Mayor Rahm Emanuel “exploded” at her during a conversation in his office about his signature longer-school-day effort, pointing his finger at her, yelling and telling her, “F--- you, Lewis.”
“I just want to call it immense disrespect for me and the Chicago Teachers Union,’’ Lewis told the Chicago Sun-Times Friday. “I didn’t appreciate the way he talked to me.
“My father never talked to me like that. My husband’s never talked to me like that.”
Emanuel — long known for his salty rants — would not go into specifics Friday about the exchange, and said the meeting weeks ago ended with a hug from Lewis.
“I’m not going to get into a he-said, she-said. We had a good meeting. It was not a long meeting. We talked about a longer school day and we talked about focusing on elementary kids,” the mayor said.
So, let me understand this. You want better treatment from the mayor of Chicago than from your own family members? How, exactly, does that work?
I don't know about you, but I got (and get) the best treatment from my dad and my husband.
In any case, this seems like a desperate ploy to garner some sympathy for the teachers union, because nobody is feeling all that sorry for them having to work marginally longer hours. The retort on that is likely: "You still have summers off. And you have a job."
It's a weak ass attempt to get sympathy, though.
Rahm cursed you out? Congrats. You're now part of the club.
Neutral – Obama Defends Maginot Line
Having grown up in the States among people with a healthy contempt for France, I was exposed to all manner of jokes at the expense of the French people. It was at a very young age that I heard the following:
Did you know French tanks are built with only one gear?
Routed by the Germans not just once but twice in the first 50 years of the century past seemed to have earned the French the unfortunate reputation of being adept at retreat.
When I went off to college my area of interest was 20th Century Europe... which one cannot study without a great deal of interest in Military History. I took a particular interest in Military Strategy during this time... though I was of course fascinated by the politics. What I learned about WWI and WWII taught me many things about Systems, people, Humanity, etc...
It also gave me a more nuanced view of the French.
A tank with one gear is problematic. Especially when that gear is Reverse. But there is something worse than a tank that can only go backwards... namely, a tank stuck in Neutral.
In defense of the French, there were plausible, unforeseen technologies in play... and the manner in which war itself was waged - the way generals and majors went about conducting it - had never morphed so radically as it did between the late 1800s and the onset of WWI. Other tectonic shifts became obvious as WWII broke out, as all of you well know. It stands, however weakly, that the French can appeal to us on this score.
But there is something else, however, one must acknowledge about the French: they knew when to disengage from battle. Or, if you prefer, retreat. Or, if you prefer, live to fight another day. That is, in studying the record, one sees that some semblance of strategy is to be found as it relates to the behavior of the French in both of the World Wars.
I cannot say the same thing about the current president. It is truly bizarre. Good God, man! Man up! Advance, hold, or retreat.
Hitler, the record shows, had truly lost touch at the twilight of the Third Reich. One such way we know this is from the orders he was issuing to his field generals up until the very end: to advance on this position or hold that position even though there were no troops left to advance or hold.
I look at Obama now and I am starting to feel a bit sorry for him. He is a starry-eyed boy sitting stunned and confused on a very real and brutal battlefield. I am no Unionista, but from my point of view he is perhaps the last person I would ever follow into battle. And not just because his tank remains in Neutral.
State of the City: Blithe Comments from Rahm
Let's see what Rahm Emmanuel has to say about his nascent mayorlty:
If Rahm Emanuel had known being mayor of Chicago was this much fun, he likes to joke that he would have “primaried” his political mentor four years ago.
“As I told Rich Daley, ‘You didn’t tell me the truth. You said it was gonna be a good job. It’s not a good job. It’s a great job.’ I tease him about that all the time,” Emanuel told the Chicago Sun-Times in an interview on his first 100 days in office.
“I’m having a blast. . . . [Wife] Amy and the kids [say], ‘Dad seems happy.’ If you want to see change and see what you’re doing impact people, this is one of the most dynamic and exciting opportunities of a lifetime. . . . It sure beats walking around with the world on your shoulders” as White House chief of staff.
Awwwww, how endearing.
Let's look at what he's been up to!
First, he's hired some consultants to cut city contracts to the bone:
Mayor Rahm Emanuel on Thursday hired a private consulting firm to consolidate and overhaul city contracts and wring at least $25 million in savings out of $500 million in purchases.
The savings generated by Accenture are expected to come from renegotiating some contracts, rebidding others and combining purchases by individual city departments to get a cheaper bulk price.
The contract calls for the company to review $500 million in contracts and get 10 percent of the first $70 million in savings, with a smaller percentage after that. But Accenture will not get paid at all until Chicago taxpayers get their check.
Actually, that sounds good to me.
But there are harder cuts as well:
Of all the sad statistics related to the financial crisis at Chicago Public Schools, one of the most alarming is simply this: The school district is spending millions more every year to educate fewer children.
Into this mess steps Jean-Claude Brizard and a new leadership team pledging to rebuild the financial footing and repair the miserable academic performance of a school district that, by most measures, is struggling.
Brizard said Thursday that the previous leadership had only recently awakened to the bloated bureaucracy at CPS — trimming central office staff by 327 since 2009 — but that cuts should have been deeper.
"If we don't make these courageous decisions, we're going to be right back where we were — where past CEOs, past administrations, have faced problems and didn't do enough to actually correct it," Brizard said in a meeting with the Tribune's editorial board. "The very financial health of the system hinges on that."
Some of the decisions envisioned include:
•Closing schools, including charters, that aren't working or are underenrolled.
•Restructuring contracts with teachers, janitors, bus drivers and other pacts that have become burdensome.
•Consolidating jobs and departments within the central office.
•Laying off staff.
•Raising taxes when necessary.
•Creating a school system where the best-performing, not the longest-serving, principals and teachers earn the most money.
Previous administrations have made similar promises, only to see the problems get worse. But Brizard says this mandate for change comes from Mayor Rahm Emanuel.
Still, cutting fat is good.
But hey - what's this extra thing he wants to pay for?
Is Rahm nuts?
•
Mayor Rahm Emanuel today said the city has an obligation to pay for former Mayor Richard Daley’s legal defense if he is sued for alleged police brutality conspiracies that happened under former Chicago police Cmdr. Jon Burge.
The city will not, however, run up unnecessary legal bills to defend Daley or Burge, Emanuel said.
“We’re not going to be reckless and let the meter run legally,” Emanuel said.
Really? Why don't we stop this one before it even starts then.
Who was Daley working for when all of this allegedly occurred? Does Rahm even remember Daley's title at the time?
•Cook County State's Attorney
Chicago wasn't employing him at the time, nor signing his checks. So what the hell is Rahm doing promising to pay for Daley's alleged actions?
To be sure, if it was when Daley was Cook County's State Attorney he has absolute immunity, and my understanding is that the civil complaint is based on when Daley was mayor.
But frankly, I don't see that with all this scrounging for spare change in Chicago's couches, that Rahm can make a great case that the less-than-pristine Daley should be defended with the tax dollars of Chicago.
But I guess he's hoping for the same courtesy when he's ex-mayor.
Thanks to reader TRB in pointing me to the Second City Cop blog -- other posts of interest:
Chicago: Old Ghosts Coming for Daley
The former long-time mayor of Chicago has been dodging all sorts of reckoning over the years. It may finally be catching up with him in a civil lawsuit filed against various parties, related to long-running police brutality in Chicago that was tied to false confessions:
For the first time, a federal judge has ruled former Mayor Richard M. Daley can be sued as a defendant for his alleged role in what plaintiffs claim is a citywide conspiracy to cover up police torture.
And Daley could be deposed by lawyers representing alleged victims, all African American, who charge their abuse came at the hands of a small band of predominantly white police officers under the command of former Chicago Police Cmdr. Jon Burge.
The Burge case has already cost Chicago taxpayers more than $43 million in settlements and outside legal fees. Burge is in federal prison.
Though Daley was questioned under oath by a court-appointed special prosecutor in 2006, it was widely criticized as an overly solicitous interview. This would likely be a more adversarial exchange.
The deposition date is set for early September.
For more info on the cases surrounding Jon Burge, the entry at wikipedia is rather comprehensive. I'll set you down at "torture methods". This may shock you, but Daley had a primary challenger in 1991 who brought up this issue... and Daley, of course, won.
But here's a twist: Daley had been county prosecutor during the time of the most notorious torture cases - the 1980s. He was able to escape civil liability due to his position then.... but he became mayor in 1989. And they're going after him for that time period, as he resisted investigation of the issue.
I bet with regards to any civil award, it will be the city of Chicago paying, not Daley's personal wealth. But what Daley could be paying is his reputation.
And it's about damn time for that to start.
So.... what is Rahm Emmanuel's connection to the Daley machine? Does he owe the old man anything? Is it in his interest to settle this quickly & quietly, or would he like the full deposition to go on?
I could see Rahm letting this fester, so he can blame the current problems of Chicago (crumbling finances, the violent flash mob activity along the Magnificent Mile) on Daley (and he would have a point), and just so that he can look like the good-government guy (snort).
Emmanuel has been doing all sorts of stuff in Chicago that has local unionists up in arms, by the way. Have you heard about it in the national news, like Gov. Walker's cuts?




